Healthcare Related Laws

The list below is an alphabetical order list of Malaysian laws which may directly or indirectly affect healthcare in Malaysia. This list will be updated as and when necessary.
References:
MyLawyer.com.my, 2013, viewed 9 February 2013, <http://www.mylawyer.com.my/index.php>

ALPHABETHICAL LIST OF THE LAWS OF MALAYSIA (LOM) WHICH MAY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AFFECT HEALTHCARE IN MALAYSIA

No.LAWS OF MALAYSIA (LOM)
1Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957 (Revised 1983)
2Care Centres Act 1993
3Census Act 1960 (Revised 1969)
4Child Act 2001, Act 611
5Child Care Centre Act 1984
6Child Protection Act 1991
7Children and Young Persons Act 1947
8Computer Crimes Act 1997
9Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Revised 1980)
10Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988
11Dental Act 1971
12Destitute Persons Act 1977
13Destruction of Disease-Bearing Insects
14Digital Signature Act 1997
15Drug Dependants (Treatment and Rehabilitation) Act 1983
16Employees’ Social Security Act 1969
17Evidence Act 1950, Section 90A
18Fees Act 1951 (Revised 1978)
19Human Tissues Act 1974
20Malaysian Health Promotion Board Act 2006
21Medical Act 1971
22Medical Assistants (Registration) Act 1977
23Medicines (Advertisement and Sale) Act 1956 (Revised 1983)
24Mental Health Act 2001 (Not yet in force)
25Midwives Act 1966 (Revised 1990) Military Manoeuvres Act 1983
26National Archives Act 1966
27National Archives Act 2003
28National Registration Act 1959 (Revised 1972)
29Nurses Act 1950 (Revised 1969)
30Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994
31Optical Act 1991
32Personal Data Protection Act 2010
33Pesticides Act 1974
34Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998
35Private Hospitals Act 1971 ( Repealed by Act 586 )
36Registration of Births and Deaths (Special Provisions) Act 1975
37Registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 (Revised 1989)
38Sale of Drugs Act 1952 (Revised 1989)
39Sale of Drugs Act 1952 (Revised 1989)
40Sewerage Services Act 1993
41Telemedicine Act 1997 (Not yet in force)

Recent Posts

EHR data and AI to predict response to antidepressant treatment

Antidepressants are frequently prescribed for adults with depression, a common and often disabling psychiatric condition. However, identifying the most effective treatment for a particular patient is often a trial-and-error process that can result in prolonged morbidity, disability, and exposure to adverse effects, as well as substantial healthcare costs. Precision psychiatry aims to optimise treatment matching using patient-specific profiles, but there are few evidence-based predictors available to clinicians initiating antidepressant treatment.

Although average response rates are similar across different antidepressant classes, individual responses can vary widely in clinical practice. Therefore, accurately and scalably guiding antidepressant selection presents specific challenges. The gold standard for characterising antidepressant response from electronic health records (EHRs) remains expert chart review, which is labor- and time-intensive.

However, advances in machine learning (ML) and the growing availability of large-scale health data, such as EHRs, offer new opportunities for developing clinical decision-support tools that may address this challenge. In a recent study published in the peer-reviewed open-access medical journal Nature Partner Journals (npc) Digital Medicine, researchers used machine learning models to accurately predict differential treatment response probabilities for patients and between antidepressant classes based on real-world EHR data. The pipeline incorporated AI and non-AI features, as well as unstructured data (i.e. clinical notes) to maximize the use of information contained in EHRs.

The study included 17,556 patients who received a new antidepressant prescription from non-psychiatrists, and data were obtained from 20 years of EHRs spanning from January 1990 to August 2018. The patients had at least one International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for depression and at least one ICD code for non-recurrent depression during their history.

ICD codes from EHR data were obtained for adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least one visit (the first visit with an antidepressant prescription is defined as the “index visit” for each patient) with a diagnostic ICD code for a depressive disorder (defined as ICD-9-CM: 296.20–6, 296.30–6, and 311; ICD-10-CM: F32.0–9, F33.0–9) co-occurring with an antidepressant prescription, and at least one ICD code for non-recurrent depression (ICD-9-CM: 296.20–6 and 311; ICD-10-CM: F32.0–9) any time during their history.

The resulting models achieved good accuracy, discrimination, and positive predictive value, which could be valuable for further efforts aiming to provide clinical decision support for prescribers. However, the researchers noted several limitations, including missing data in EHRs(e.g. patients who may receive some of their care outside of the healthcare system), and secular trends in clinician prescribing or documentation practices that may have affected model performance.

In summary, the study presents a novel computational pipeline based on real-world EHR data for predicting differential responses to commonly used classes of antidepressants. The approach demonstrated here could be adapted to a wide variety of other clinical applications for optimising and individualising treatment selection.

REFERENCES:

  1. Sheu, Yh., Magdamo, C., Miller, M. et al. AI-assisted prediction of differential response to antidepressant classes using electronic health records. npj Digit. Med. 6, 73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00817-8


  1. Implementing the EMR system in hospitals nationwide Leave a reply
  2. World Tuberculosis Day 2023 Leave a reply
  3. Special allocation for HKL for digitalisation of patient records Leave a reply
  4. International Pi Day 2023 Leave a reply