Category Archives: JCI Standards

Data must be aggregated, analysed, and transformed into useful information by expert individuals

Posted on by
1

A hospital’s primary purpose is to provide patient care and to work to improve patient care outcomes over time by applying quality improvement principles. To reach conclusions and to make decisions on how to work to improve patient care outcomes over time, requires access to a wide range of information from varying sources.

Each time patients receive health care, a record is generated to document the patient’s current symptoms,medical history, results of examination, treatments rendered along with outcomes, ancillary report results (e.g., laboratory), diagnoses, and plans for treatment. This patient data is organised, analysed, and maintained by Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners working in hospital settings to ensure the delivery of quality health care.

Data collection and analysis processes entail combining patient care data from various sources and transformed into useful information.  But the ability to collect and analyse data within and across hospitals is hampered by different information systems and processes, and by the highly complex and fragmented nature of health care systems.

Converting data into meaningful information for decision making calls for the expertise of trained and qualified professionals. The data analysis process involves individuals who will be among medical, nursing, and other departmental heads who participate in relevant quality improvement and patient safety processes. These indivuals must understand information management, have skills in data aggregation methods, and know how to use various statistical tools and techniques when suitable, and participate in the process.

Understanding statistical techniques is helpful in data analysis, especially in interpreting variation and deciding where improvement needs to occur. Every system has variation; some of this is due to the system itself, known as common cause variation; some of it is due to singular incidents or special situations; this is special cause variation. 94 percent of problems (or possibilities for improvement) lie with the system as common-cause variation; 6 percent are special causes (Deming, 1982). In understanding trends and variation in health care, statistical tools for example run charts, control charts, histograms, and Pareto charts can prove to be useful statistical tools to know. Examining data over a period of time and making decisions based on trends or other patterns, will save time, energy, and other resources.

HIM/MR practitioners are trained in managing patient health information and medical records, administering computer information systems, and coding diagnoses and procedures for health care services provided to patients, and have an understanding of statistical techniques as part of their training and education.  I believe their unique knowledge and expertise in hospital management information systems will enable strong partnerships beween them and with clinical and management teams to advance the quality and safety of patient care delivery.

Image credit : http://www.dashboardinsight.com/

Data analysis must provide continuous feedback of quality management information to help those individuals make decisions and providing continuous quality improvement, and allocating limited resources to optimise quality and effectiveness. Thus, results of data analysis need to be reported to those individuals responsible for the process or outcome being measured  and who are accountable for taking action of the results.

Hospitals which have adopted the Joint Commission International (JCI) hospital accreditation program, and who are already JCI acredited or hospitals seeking JCI accreditation status or hospitals that are seeking for a re-survey for JCI accreditation status, have to comply with JCI Standard QPS.4, which specifically requires that individuals in  a hospital with appropriate experience, knowledge, and skills systematically aggregate and analyze data using statistical tools and techniques when suitable and transform the data into useful information. This standard also requires that  “Results of analysis are reported to those accountable for taking action.”

It is imperative from the above that HIM/MR practitioners practicing in hosptitals with a quality improvement and patient safety program such as hospital accreditation are likely individuals who will be among medical, nursing, and other departmental heads who participate in relevant quality improvement and patient safety processes. HIM/MR practitioners as trained individuals to understand healthcare information management, have skills in data aggregation methods, and know how to use various statistical tools and techniques, and thus I believe they will be best suited for this role.

References :
American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) 2011, HIM Functions in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety, Viewed 15 September 2012 < http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_049122.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_049122>

Deming, WE 1982, Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

The assessment findings from patient’s and family’s ability to learn and willingness to learn are documented in the patient’s record

Posted on by
1

A patient education plan should be among the contents of a medical record. Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners need to know that assessment findings of patients and their family of their knowledge and skill strengths and deficits documented in the patient’s medical records, are used to plan the education.

I think HIM/MR practitioners also need to know and understand why this documentation forms part of a medical record.

HIM/MR practitioners must understand  that patient and family education is an integral part of patient care. Caregivers at a hospital must assist the patient to identify the learning needs and resources to help restore and maintain an optimal level of functioning. A knowledge deficit about the course of illness and self-care practices hinders a patient’s recovering from illness or engaging in health-promoting behaviors.

To help bridge the gap between what a patient knows and what a patient needs to know in order to achieve optimum health, a plan must be formulated to determine if the patient and family are willing and capable to learn. The patient and family ability to learn and willingness to learn are then assessed

Thus, the HIM/MR practitioners will find documentation of the assessment findings based on many patient variables that determine if the patient and family are willing and capable to learn. Therefore, to plan the education, the hospital assesses:

  1. the patient’s and family’s beliefs and values since different people attach different values to different types of risk. and patients of different cultures react to illness with their own ingrained broader health belief systems encompassing just about everything seen, heard or felt since their birth; this is especially so as the world becomes borderless and with the new wave of medical tourists searching for the cutting-edge medical expertise and technology, it is common in hospital settings to receive an increasing number of incoming medical tourism patients and immigrant patients from various ethnic and cultural backgrounds
  2. their literacy, educational level, and language as health care teaching involves the use of printed materials, involves reading, comprehension, basic mathematical abilities, and the ability to make health care decisions
  3. emotional barriers – anxiety, fear, anger, depression and inability to comprehend and motivations – frequent reinforcement of learning through immediate feedback and continual reassessment of effectiveness enhances the value of the learning
  4. physical limitations – affecting learning that involves physical application of knowledge for example when a patient learns to give himself or herself an injection, and cognitive limitations – affecting learning that involves the acquisition of facts and data often used in problem solving and decision-making
  5. the patient’s willingness to receive information

HIM/MR practitioners working in a hospital setting that has acquired the Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation status or is planning to be accredited or been re-surveyed by JCI, must know that JCI mandates that medical records should contain documentation on patient teaching and learning. The JCI Standard PFE.2.1 requires that “The patient’s and family’s ability to learn and willingness to learn are assessed.” and also requires that “The assessment findings are documented in the patient’s record.”

However, HIM/MR practitioners need to realise that patient education is a standard and essential component of medical and nursing practice, teaching interventions and the patient’s response must be documented in all practice settings. Elements of a patient education plan include:

  1. content taught
  2. teaching methods used
  3. who was taught (e.g., patient, which family member, other caretaker)
  4. patient and family response to teaching activities

One approach of documentation for patient and family teaching is by using codes that helps nurses, doctors and other health care providers to document and track patient education in a Patient and Family Education Record. Nurses, doctors and other health care providers make an assessment of need, provide education and then document the encounter using codes found in the form. The codes allow the educator a quick method of documenting that education took place during a given patient visit or stay. The form informs everyone using the form that a given patient received education on specific topics and encourage subsequent health professionals to do the appropriate follow-up.

Click here (this link opens in a new tab of your current window browser) for an example of a Patient and Family Education Record.

Such documentation promotes (Sue and Patricia, 201) continuity of care and facilitates accurate communication to other health care providers.

References :
Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Sue, CD & Patricia, KL 2011, Fundamentals of Nursing: Standards & Practice, 4th edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA

University of Connecticut Health Center USA, PATIENT AND FAMILY TEACHING RECORD – Family Education of the Hospitalized Infant, viewed 12 September 2012 <http://nursing.uchc.edu/unit_manuals/ccmc_nicu/FORMS/FORM%20-%20Family%20Education%20of%20the%20Hospitalized%20Infant%20(9-1-11).pdf>

Plan of posts on Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) standards

Posted on by
Reply

I first introduced an approach to make real improvements that help patients and reduce risks through international accreditation standards in my post An overview of quality indicators under the JCI QPS approach (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window).

In that post I prepared the ground for future posts on patient safety in the accreditation process of the Joint Commission International  (JCI) from the chapter “Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS)”. In promoting the quality agenda in hospitals, this QPS chapter from the  JOINT COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR HOSPITALS, 4TH EDITION manual describes a comprehensive approach to quality improvement and patient safety.

In this post, I shall present my plan to discuss how best I think Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners can contribute and benefit by applying the QPS standards to their daily work to understand how processes can be more efficient, resources can be used more wisely, and physical risks can be reduced.

The QPS chapter presents the standards into five (5) sections (as I shall refer the layout of the standards from this chapter ) of standards as follows :

  1. Section 1 : Leadership and Planning
  2. Section 2 : Design of Clinical and Managerial Processes
  3. Section 3 : Measure Selection and Data Collection (Data Collection for Quality Measurement)
  4. Section 4 : Validation and Analysis of Measurement Data (Analysis of Measurement Data)
  5. Section 5 : Gaining and Sustaining Improvement (Improvement)

Section 1 is about hospital management (leaders) collaboration to carry out a quality improvement and patient safety program.

Design of new and modified systems and processes according to quality improvement principles is covered in standards from Section 2.

Selection and data collection of key measures for each of the hospital’s clinical and managerial structures, processes, and outcomes are requirements for standards under Section 3.

Section 4 has several standards that outlines what, when, who and how on validation and analysis stages of data collected from identified key measures in Section 3.

Knowledge gained from data analysis of Section 4 is gainfully used (acheieved) to identify potential improvements or to reduce (or prevent) adverse events and sustained through an ongoing program of risk management. Data collected is also used to identify improvement and safety activities for the priority areas identified. An ongoing program of risk management is used to identify and to reduce unanticipated adverse events and other safety risks to patients and staff. These are improvement and safety activities covered under the standards from Section 5.

I believe that HIM/MR practitioners will be involved from the initial stage of collaboration with hospital management and other departmental leaders to carry out a quality improvement and patient safety program to the period when risk management activities continue to sustain the hospital’s Quality Improvement and Patient Safety program.

My next post on QPS standards for quality improvement and safety activities will begin with standards found under Section 4. I plan to walk through these standards first as I think they will involve health information contained in medical records, directly involving HIM/MR practitioners in data collection and analysis of clinical structures, processes, and outcomes.

However, I shall be paying visits to the other standards in the QPS chapter and cross-referencing them or making separate posts for any QPS standard apart from those from Section 4. I believe there is no one right way to approach quality improvement and safety activities by using the framework enshrined in the JCI QPS chapter but I plan to approach the way I feel the best way I can do in benefit of HIM/MR practitioners.

References :
Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Medical records should contain the patient’s educational needs assessment documentation

Posted on by
1

The Seven Dimensions of Patient-Centered Care described by the Picker Institute Inc., an international non-profit organisation dedicated to advancing the principles of patient-centered care through education, research and the public recognition of best practices,  provide an excellent starting point for any hospital to begin a customer focused improvement effort. These dimensions of care can be viewed from the image below.

Image credit : http://pickerinstitute.org/about/picker-principles/

I shall focus my discussion of this post with reference to two (2) out of these 7 dimensions, namely (i) involving information, communication and education and (ii) the involvement of family and friends.

As consumers (patients) or as member(s) of the patient’s family, many readers are already acquainted with the situation when you as the patient or as member(s) of the patient’s family believe that information is often being withheld from you or your family and that they are not being completely informed about their condition or prognosis. The patient or  as member(s) of the patient’s family often experience anxiety over clinical status, treatment and prognosis, the impact of the illness on themselves and family, and the financial impact of illness.

Many readers will also be already acquainted with the situation when you as the patient will address the role of your family and friends with your hospital experience, often expressing concern about the impact your illness has on your family and friends.

In recognition of the needs of family and friends and the involvement of family and friends, a hospital and its doctors, nurses and other caregivers must accommodate family and friends on whom the patient relies for social and emotional support, and also give support for family members as caregivers as well as to support the patient “advocate’s” role in decision-making of the care process.

Image credit : http://fibrocarecenter.com/

It is only appropriate that  any hospital dedicated to advancing the principles of patient-centered care through education provides patient/family education to enhance the patient/family knowledge, skills, and behaviours s/he needs to restore quality of life and make informed health care decisions.

Patient/family education is initiated at the time of admission and, as needed, throughout the patient’s stay at the hospital.

Education by the hospital staff is provided to patients and families when a patient or family directly participates in providing care (for example, changing dressings, feeding the patient, administering medications and treatments), they need to be educated.

Education focuses on the specific knowledge and skills the patient and family will need to make care decisions, participate in their care, and continue care at home. This is in contrast to the general flow of information between staff and the patient that is informative but not of an educational nature.

But in order to understand the educational needs of each patient and his or her family, assessments are done to evaluate if:

  1. the patient mutually meets established goals and objective
  2. ihe patient’s attitudes has changed
  3. the patient can cope better with illness imposed limitations
  4. identify the types of surgeries, other invasive procedures and treatments planned and if the patient understands the accompanying nursing needs
  5. the family understand health problems and know how to help
  6. the patient and family understand and can demonstrate skills the continuing care needs following discharge

This assessment permits the patient’s care givers to plan and to deliver the needed education. Once the educational needs are identified, they are recorded uniformly by all staff in the patient’s medical record. This helps all the patient’s caregivers participate in the education process.

Education is also provided as part of the process of obtaining informed consent for treatment (for example, for surgery and anaesthesia) when patients and families learn about the process for granting informed consent.

Overall, education by the hospital staff makes patients and families learn:

  1. about how to participate in care decisions
  2. about their conditions and any confirmed diagnoses
  3. their rights to participate in the care process

At hospitals that are Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or re-applying for JCI accreditation status, they are required to comply with the JCI Standard PFE.2 which requires that each patient’s educational needs are assessed prior to providing the appropriate levels of education.

The JCI Standard PFE.2 also requires that a patient’s medical records should contain the patient’s educational needs assessment documentation. Such documentation includes the following:

  1. assessment and identification of educational needs
  2. the patient’s ability to learn/understand the information
  3. teaching interventions to meet identified needs
  4. the patient/family understanding of the instruction or education provided

Documentation of patient/family education could be located on a special form, for example a Multidisciplinary Education Form/ Patient Education Sheet or in progress notes.

I think it is appropriate that Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners should give comments when a hospital reviews, plans and decides the location and format for educational assessment, planning, and delivery of information in the patient’s medical record.

The JCI Standard PFE.2 is listed in the Medical Records Review Tool form to check for compliance against this standard during a Medical Records Review process.

References :
Diane, LK 2007, Applying quality management in healthcare : a systems approach, 2nd edn, Health Administration Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Picker Institute, Principles Of Patient-Centered Care, viewed 9 September 2012, <http://pickerinstitute.org/about/picker-principles/>

Sue, CD & Patricia, KL 2011, Fundamentals of Nursing: Standards & Practice, 4th edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA

JCI Standard MCI.20 – Aggregate data and information must support the quality management program of a hospital

Posted on by
Reply

The post JCI Standard MCI.20 – Aggregate data and information support patient care, organisation management, and the quality management program (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window) supported how aggregate data and information support patient care and organisation management. This post will continue where I left off from there, and now discuss further on the Joint Commission International (JCI) Standard MCI.20 which requires that aggregate data (based on performance, utilisation, and resource management) and information also support the quality management program of a hospital.

But before I change to higher gears and bring you coverage of activities on the quality management program of a hospital, I am sure Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners following this blog will be wondering if they can skip this post as they might postulate that quality management programs have nothing to do with HIM/MR management. I think HIM/MR practitioner readers need to hold on and read on as they have a role to play in the quality management program of a hospital.

To be honest there is so much to write about this area of concern but I think I shall restrain myself to be brief but as complete as possible. I shall relate the role of HIM/MR practitioners play where I think they need to.

During their formative training, HIM/MR practitioners may become aware that some licensed professionals or hospital staff are involved in utilisation review, quality improvement, utility system management, infection prevention and control, and risk management activities; but I am think only few are aware of the rich scientific base and health tradition that frames these fields. Let’s understand these activities first.

Utilisation management (UM) or Utility System Management (USM) activities directly impact the quality of outcomes through the most efficient and effective manner of delivering health care for the patient and the population. A mix of clinical, administrative, and financial methods are used to evaluate the appropriateness, the processes, the facilities, and the providers of care.

The UM process includes interventions that take place before, during, and after a clinical event occurs. Data for this process must be accurate, timely, relevant, and easily collectible at a reasonable cost. Defensible administrative or clinical types of data that have been validated are used when evaluating performance for UM. HIM/MR practitioners can anticipate that clinical data in medical records will be used in the design and data collection for UM studies.

My experiences in measuring and improving hospital quality provides insights that quality improvement is an important challenge in any attempt to improve the health care system. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) describes quality improvement (QI) as “doing the right thing at the right time for the right individual to get the best possible results.” Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is a tool that can be used to respond to identified problems, prevent problems, and improve upon the status quo. Total Quality Management (TQM) on the other hand is a management philosophy that emphasises a commitment to excellence throughout the organisation; implemented in combination with CQI.

Information management involving HIM/MR practitioners enables hospitals to support patient safety improvement efforts by providing accurate and complete data. HIM/MR practitioners must be able to identify data elements for use in quality and patient safety measures and ensure these measures are being reported correctly and resolve any issues that may exist with data consistency and completeness. HIM/MR  practitioners should also identify opportunities to participate in standards development or reviews at the hospital and provide reviews and comments on new and revised standards and quality and patient safety measures.

A nurse administered the wrong medication to a patient. A visitor slips and falls on a wet floor, even though the wet floor was well-marked. The wrong medication to a patient is a medical error, while when the visitor slipped and fell on a wet floor, is an accident that results in personal injury. Medical error or an accident that results in personal injury or loss of property are all circumstances that put patients, visitors or a hospital at risk for adverse outcomes. Incident reports are generated on patients and visitors about a potentially compensable event (PCE).

Risk management is about identifying circumstances that put patients, visitors or a hospital at risk, been responsible for coordinating and monitoring risk management activities, analysing trends of incidents, and establishing priorities for dealing with high-risk areas, and putting into operation methods that avoid, prevent, and control such risks. The goal is to ensure patient safety.

HIM/MR practitioners need to know that incident reports are considered a secondary source of patient information. They must ensure that incident reports are never filed in the patient’s medical record, so that incident reports are not subject to disclosure (release) when patient records are subpoenaed or requested (e.g., by an attorney) upon patient authorisation. Incident reports are filed with the hospital’s risk management office or the quality assurance department.

The infection prevention and control process is designed to lower the risk of infection for patients not present on admission, staff, and others. To reach this goal and minimise their overwhelming consequences in terms of cost, morbidity, and mortality, a hospital proactively identifies and track risks, rates, and trends in health care–associated infections (HAI).

A hospital uses measurement information to improve infection prevention and control activities and to reduce HAI rates to the lowest possible levels through consistent, mindful adherence to basic infection control principles and measures which include for example, hand decontamination upon entering and leaving every patient encounter – usually referred to as universal precautions, a critical protective strategy.

A review of 20 medical records for patients who received a overmedication for a particular drug is likely to yield a much higher incidence of overmedication for the particular drug than a random sample of 20 medical records. A more thorough review of the medical records gathers information to help develop a collective picture of a practice that can identify the outlier or unusual event (in this case overmedication for a particular drug) during a particular procedure/process (in this case medication for a particular drug). Screening medical records in this way for the presence of adverse events is a tool for data acquisition for a morbidity and mortality committee to identify contributory factors, which indicate areas for improvement and prevention.

Much of the discussion above is an important part of the hospital’s performance improvement activities with the intent to gather and aggregate data that can be used to create safety alerts and tips, to identify and showcase best practices, and to highlight trends. Aggregate data and information must be seen to support the quality management program of a hospital in order to comply with JCI Standard MCI.20, ME 3, and if in any case help the hospital understand its current performance and identify opportunities for improvement.

References :
Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Michelle, AG & Mary, JB 2011, Essentials of Health Information Management: Principles and Practices, 2nd edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA

Prathibha, V (ed.) 2010, Medical quality management : theory and practice, 2nd edn,  Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA