Category Archives: MCI.12

MSQH – SERVICE STANDARD 7, Organisation and Management for STANDARD 7.1.1

Posted on by
Reply

MSQH-Book-SS7-HMISOrganisation and Management is the first topic among six (6) topics which make up the standards under SERVICE STANDARD 7 for Health Information Management System (HIMS) based on the 4th Edition of the Malaysian Society for Quality in Health (MSQH) Hospital Accreditation Standards effective January 2013, used by the MSQH, which is the sole Malaysian accreditation body with nationally established standards for health care facilities and services since 1997, dedicated to improving the quality of Malaysia’s health care through voluntary accreditation. You can read about the 6 topics from the post MSQH – Introductory Post (this link will open in a new tab of your current window) as well view the hierarchy of these topics (the green boxes) from the graphic below (click on the graphic to view a larger image which will open in a new tab of your current window).

MSQH Service Standard 7

Standard 7.1.1 is the first standard for Service Standard 7 and the only standard under the topic Organisation and Management (OM) which states that “The Health Information Management System (HIMS) Services shall be organised and administered to facilitate the collation, aggregation and analysis of hospital demographic data through an established system which includes safe keeping and retrieval of medical records and documents related to patient care.

Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners in Malaysia whose hospitals are engaged in hospital accreditation using the 4th Edition of the Malaysian Society for Quality in Health (MSQH) Hospital Accreditation Standards effective January 2013 for the Service Standard 7 HIMS must truely know that his or her hospital needs to fully satisfy fifteen (15) criteria for compliance to the OM topic for this service standard.

The criteria for compliance to the OM topic for this service standard ranges from the organisation management of the HIM / MR Department through processes planning and continued development, data management of information about major clinical services that meets Malaysian statutory requirements, reporting systems for incident reports, the formation and activities of a Medical Records Committee, and ends with the department’s involvement in quality improvement activities.

You can view the whole range of criteria listed from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1XnOSMJXDaqR184d1BsbHQxQWs/edit (this link will open in a new tab of your current window) from the Download List Sub-Menu under the Resources Menu.

Now I like to draw your attention to the variation or differentiation between nearly identical entities and other non-identical entities found under MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 and those found under the  Joint Commission International (JCI) hospital accreditation standards,

HIM / MR practitioners will find a similarity between JCI hospital accreditation found in Standard MCI.9 (which I have not blogged on as yet) with  the MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 under Criterias 7.1.1.1 to 7.1.1.10 when both of them try to cover aspects of the HIM / MR department’s mission, services provided, resources, access to affordable technology,and support for effective communication among caregivers

HIM / MR practitioners will find another similarity between JCI hospital accreditation found in Standard MCI.19.4 with the MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 under Criteria 7.1.1.13 which requires regular Medical Records Review (MRR) sessions. However the MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 under Criteria 7.1.1.13 does not elaborate the review process nor is there any  MMR tool to use unlike that found under JCI.

Unlike hospital accreditation for JCI accreditation status, a specific Root Cause Analysis (RCA) activity is required of HIM / MR practitioners under  the MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 under Criteria 7.1.1.12 . I hope HIM / MR practitioners will not be wrongly allocated the task of conducting RCA for all incidents that occur in the hospital but rather they will only be confined to RCA for all incidents that occur for HMIS services only. as I understand from Criteria 7.1.1.11, MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 which stipulates that “The Head of the HIMS Services shall ensure that the staff of HIMS Services complete incident reports which are discussed by the services with learning objectives and forwarded to the Person In Charge (PIC) of the Facility.”

There is no direct reference to “The Medical Records Committee” to be found in JCI. However, HIM / MR practitioners in Malaysia need to be aware that according to the notes found under Criteria 7.1.1.13, MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 “The Medical Records Committee is a subcommittee of Medical and Dental Advisory Committee (MDAC) who advises the Governing Body on matters pertaining to HIMS.” and not as reporting directly to the Hospital’s Director or other equivalent top management official.

Quality Assurance (QA) Managers and their departments are normally assigned the duties of facilitating quality improvement (QI) activities for the hospital. I can infer that QA managers have a specialised and trained role in QI, and thus are fully qualified to be the facilitator of such QI activities, Nonetheless, Criteria 7.1.1.15, MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 has assigned this role with the given and added responsibility to HIM / MR practitioners to be the “facilitator for quality improvement activities of the Facility. Areas of involvement may include:

a) compiling patient care data for clinical review/research;

b) supervising data collection and advising on analysis of data collected by personnel of other services.”

Lastly, I find that MSQH Service Standard 7, Standard 7.1.1 does not have set criteria to cover the clause “safe keeping and retrieval of medical records and documents related to patient care.” while on the contrary Standard MCI.12 of the JCI clearly states that “The organization has a policy on the retention time of records, data, and information.”

References:

  1. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA
  2. SERVICE STANDARD 7 Health Information Management System 2013, Malaysian Hospital Accreditation Standards, 4th edn, The Malaysian Society for Quality in Health (MSQH), Malaysia

JCI Standard MCI.12 – a policy on the retention time of records, data, and information

Posted on by
Reply

Paper-based medical records is the way most public and private hospitals in Malaysia continue to preserve their patient medical records. Existing filing space for the efficient storage of newer medical records is a common problem, and for most Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners, it is a never-ending battle against overcrowded files and the struggle to find more space.

The need for adequate storage space for newer and older medical records (as you already know, older medical records placed in storage and rarely accessed are called archived records or inactive records) is driven by medical reasons, legal reasons and management reasons.

Medical records must be kept for so long as they are necessary to support patient care in the treatment and management of cases.

The legal documentation reason has heightened the importance of medical record retention (the length of time a hospital for example will maintain an archived record ) from the threat of medical malpractice suits, as patient and their families become more aware of the rights to quality care, and solicitors ever willing to take on medical malpractice suits.

Thus, the medical records must be kept for so long as long as the threat of a medical malpractice suit exists. So if the medical records are necessary for the purpose of a court case, the medical records must be kept until the case is concluded, a process which may take many years. A doctor may be in court as a litigant or a witness. Even as a witness in a case which is heard many years after the events in question, the doctor may need to refer to the original medical records.

Collection of hospital statistics, disease coding, claims processing, communicable disease reporting, incident reporting, morbidity and mortality reviews are some management reasons.

Does this mean that, if at all possible, medical records should be maintained indefinitely?

Given the hospital’s administrative constrains to provide additional space with additional cost implied versus the statutory mandates to maintain medical records for a defined period for legal reasons, the medical reasons, and the management reasons,.a hospital needs a strategic plan for preserving medical records for a definite period of retention.

Image credit : silverdane.com

The hospital must develop a medical record retention policy and must be guided by its own activities, research and education activities.

This policy will dictate how medical records are to stored (records can be stored on paper, microfilm, magnetic tape, optical disk, or as part of an electronic (or computer) system), where will they be stored, what happens to the medical records that have lapsed the retention period , all of which are guided by statute, regulation, law and guidelines.

I shall refrain from posting the methods of storage of newer and older medical records and the destruction of medical records that have lapsed the retention period, as I intend to only discuss on establishing a hospital retention policy for medical reasons and legal reasons but briefly and discuss a little more the quality assurance reasons.

HIM/MR practitioners already know that medical records serve for the continuity of medical and nursing care while in hospital, and follow-up care. HIM/MR practitioners also know that medical records must be maintained for specific periods for legal reasons and I like to list the relevant statutes, laws and guidelines that prevail in Malaysia :

  1. The statute of limitations, Act 254, cited as the Limitation Act 1953, dated 19 February 1953, is an Act to provide for the limitation of actions and arbitrations (which is the time period during which a person may bring forth a lawsuit including medical malpractice suits), but applies to Peninsular Malaysia only.
      1. Section 6(1) of this Act limits actions in tort to commence not more than six years after the occurrence of the damage and unlike laws in Australia, the United Kingdom and in Singapore, does not contain provisions for the discretionary extension or exclusion of the time limit allowed by law in relation to tort or personal injuries.
      2. Include in the policy if patient is under a legal disability, that the records should be kept for a minimum of 7 years from the date when the patient’s legal disability ceases or the patient’s death, whichever is earlier, as provided for under Section 24(1) of this act.
  2. Act 629, the National Archives Act 2003 (incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006), is an Act to provide for the creation, acquisition, custody, preservation, use and management of public archives and public records (records officially received or produced by any public office for the conduct of its affairs or by any public officer or employee of a public office in the course of his official duties and includes the records of any Government enterprise) and for other matters connected therewith.
      1. The National Archives of Malaysia had supported and agreed to a Ministry of Health Malaysia proposal for a uniform medical records retention and disposal schedule for all public hospitals in Malaysia. Through its letter of approval allowable under Section 27 (1) of the Act 629, the National Archives Act 2003, an approval dated 30 November 2006 was released by the National Archives for a comprehensive and standarised medical records retention and disposal schedule for all public hospitals and health facilities in Malaysia.
      2. The retention period for all medical records with the exception of medical records of psychiatric, obstetric and paediatric cases will be retained for a period of seven (7) years from the last date of treatment.
      3. A copy of this approval can be obtained from a Ministry of Health Malaysia Guideline Manual on Medical Records Management published by the Medical Development Division and released through a Director General of Health Malaysia directive No. 17 of 2012 (Pekeliling Ketua Pengarah Kesihatan Bil 17/2010, Garispanduan Pengendalian Dan Pengurusan Rekod Perubatan Pesakit Bagi Hospital-Hospital Dan Institusi Perubatan Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia, Bahagian Perkembangan Perubatan Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia, a document in Malay).
      4. The standarised medical records retention and disposal schedule for all public hospitals and health facilities in Malaysia was circulated through a MoH circular MOH/PAK/121.06.(GU), Mac 2007 in March 2007(Jadual Pelupusan Rekod Perubatan, MOH/PAK/121.06.(GU), Mac 2007 – in Malay).
  3. Act 586, Private Healthcare Facilities And Services Act 1998 (incorporating all amendments up to 1 May 2006) is an Act to provide for the regulation and control of private healthcare facilities and services and other health-related facilities and services. Section 107, (2), (f) under ‘Power to make regulations’ requires that the records to be kept of patients and persons treated in the private healthcare facilities or services but does not stipulate a retention policy.
      1. I think such private healthcare facilities or services could however plan for a retention policy for the reasons given in second paragraph of this post.
      2. The same provision of a minimum period of seven (7) years from the last date of treatment for the retention of all medical records with the exception of medical records of psychiatric, obstetric and paediatric cases could b adopted into a private hospital’s retention policy.
      3. Likewise other contents of the medical records retention and disposal schedule for all public hospitals and health facilities in Malaysia could be availed and incorporated into its own private hospital medical records retention policy.
  4. Act 21, this Act cited as the Age of Majority Act 1971 dated 30 April 1971 is an Act to amend and consolidate the law relating to the age of, states under Section (2) that the minority of all males and females shall cease and determine within Malaysia at the age of eighteen years and every such male and female attaining that age shall be of the age of majority.
      1. Since the minimum period for the retention of all medical records with the exception of medical records of psychiatric, obstetric and paediatric cases is seven (7) years from the last date of treatment, then for minors medical records should be retained for another 7 years from the age of majority, that is for 25 years.
  5. The Medical Defence Malaysia Berhad (MDMB) website at http://www.mdm.org.my/articles.php?newsID=2 (clicking on this link will open the website page in a new tab in your current window) presents a page on Medical Records: Preservation And Matters Of Evidence.  MDMB a “not-for-profit” company limited by guarantee, functioning as a mutual medical defence organisation that aims to provide support in areas such as medico-legal counselling and the development of educational resources.

HIM/MR practitioners must also know that if their hospital is in the process for accreditation of a quality program, then the medical records retention policy must be updated, readily available, complete and relevant. In order to be complete and relevant, I would recommend that this policy be jointly developed with the full knowledge and participation of the medical staff  who have contributed to a medical record content.

HIM/MR practitioners would provide secretarial support, coordinate the updating and completion of a up-to-date and revised hospital medical records policy. This policy will be measured against the Joint Commission International (JCI) Standard MCI.12 which states that “The organization has a policy on the retention time of records, data, and information”, if your hospital is on the path to be accredited or is to be re-surveyed for new period of accredited status when adopting the JCI accreditation process.

So if your hospital has a policy on retaining medical (patient clinical) records and other data and information, the retention process provides expected confidentiality and security, and all of your records, data, and information are destroyed appropriately after the retention period, then clearly this policy will comply with the JCI Standard MCI.12, ME 1 to ME 3.

This is not to imply you only rush to comply with JCI compliance (the JCI Standard MCI.12 merely states this requirement to comply with their standards compliance and accreditation status but does not necessarily mandate record retention schedules) but the policy is relevant for all the reasons as I have given above, once again to reiterate federal and local (if any) retention laws, legal requirements, need for continuing patient care and follow-up, research/educational uses, and management uses.

In closing, do take note that a  policy on retention of medical records is meant to serve as a guide on the retention periods for medical records, and do get the help of a legal counsel of your hospital or organisation if you are not sure about the Laws and their interpretations to be included in the policy.

References:
Edna,  KF 1983, Medical Records Management, 7th edn, Physician Records Company, Illiniois, USA

Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Margaret, AS 2003, Health Information Management, 5th edn, Jossey-Bass, San Framsico, USA

World Health Organisation 2006, Medical Records Manual: A Guide for Developing Countries, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Philippines