Malaysia’s National Policy for Quality in Healthcare 2022 – 2026

A National Policy for Quality in Health Care sets out a Government’s primary objectives to assure quality in health care and continuously improve the care. 

We know that quality is never an accident, always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution. Moreover, it represents the wise choice of many alternatives.

The Malaysian Institute for Health Systems Research (IHSR), in a partnership with the Malaysian Society for Quality in Health (MSQH), jointly and successfully organised to an overwhelming response to participate in the National Seminar for Quality in Healthcare free virtual seminar on October 5, 2021.

It comes when the public health care system is in dire need of refocusing its collective efforts towards improving the quality of care provided for the whole health system – public and private.

Highlights of the virtual seminar included the launching of the National Policy for Quality in Healthcare(NPQH) and a keynote address by Tan Sri Dato’Seri Dr. Noor Hisham Abdullah, the Director-General of Health Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia(MoHIM). He, in turn, launched the National Policy for Quality in Healthcare document.

This day-long seminar had many distinguished Malaysian speakers, including Dr. Samsiah Awang, Head, Centre for Healthcare Quality Research Initiative for Health Systems Research(IHSR), Datuk Dr. Kuljit Singh, the President of the Association of Private Hospitals Malaysia(APHM), Dr. Nor’ Aishah Abu Bakar, Deputy Director, Medical Care Quality Section(MoHM), and Dr. Fadzilah Shaik Allaudin, Senior Deputy Director of the Planning Division(MoHM).

Distinguished invited speakers were the Director, HEALTHQUAL, Institute for Clinical Health Sciences, UCSF, Prof. Dr. Bruce Agins, Dr. Shams Syed, and Ms. Nana A. Mensah-Abrampah. Both Shams and Nana are from the Department of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organisation, Geneva.

The many exciting topics represented ranged from National Quality Policy and Strategy: The Global Imitative/Perspective, National Policy for Quality in Healthcare for Malaysia: Where Are We Heading?, Clinical Governance and its impact on Quality in a Private Hospital, Safety and Quality in Digital Health and Innovation, Malaysian Patient Safety Goals 2.0: Concise and Practical, Compassion: The Heart of Quality and Improving Quality of Care in Resource-Limited Settings.

You may view a flipbook of the National Policy for Quality in Healthcare from (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window) http://library.nih.gov.my/e-doc/flipbook/npqh-2022-2026/index.html

As I see it, this Malaysian version of a National Policy for Quality in Healthcare document attempts to provide all public and private health officials with the strategic direction they need to follow to assure quality in health care and continuous improvement in the healthcare provided in Malaysia. 

EHR-related Safety Events

Hospitals around the globe are fast implementing or are now expanding on the use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The notion is that hospitals are able to provide better quality of care and at the same time, ensure improved productivity for providers with computer equipment hosting the EHRs.

While we watch the whole world marching onwards in implementation and expansion of EHRs, readers are reminded of the aspects of patient safety as defined by the World Health Organisation, which is to prevent errors and adverse effects to patients that are associated with health care.  Safety is what patients, families, staff, and the public are likely to expect when they are at hospitals. Thus the safety net must not only safeguard patients but staff caring for the patients and visitors to hospitals. As such, safety controls from hazards or risks posed by buildings, grounds, and equipment (JCI 2013) such as computers and EHRs to patients, families, staff, and the public must be in place at hospitals to prevent safety related events.

In this post I have summarised graphically into three (3) charts contributing factors for EHR-related Safety Events and on how to prevent, mitigate, and react to them. The facts presented in the charts are based on the opinions given by three (3) Joint Commission Resources (JCR) and JCI consultants on the ever-increasing EHR lawsuits in the United States between 2013 and 2014, as was reported recently in Becker’s Health IT and CIO Review.

The Charts 1 and 2 show eight (8) common causes of EHR-related safety events as follows:

  1. user error
  2. EHR builds
  3. workflows
  4. limited EHR interoperability across all three levels of health information technology interoperability i.e. foundational, structural and semantic levels
  5. deficient provider EHR education
  6. poor post-deployment vendor or institutional support
  7. losing sight of EHR best practices
  8. organisations that do not have a well-organised paper medical record cannot describe what they want in an EHR thus leading to work arounds 

EHR-related-Safety-Events-1

EHR-related-Safety-Events-2Chart 3 presents six (6) ideas on what can be done to decrease the number of EHR-related safety mistakes which are:

  1. need to make end users aware of the potential this technology has to contribute to safety events
  2. encourage the reporting of events that may be related to EHRs
  3. if an EHR-related safety event occurs, the event should be analysed
  4. resources should be available to address post go-live optimization
  5. third party consultants
  6. use patient safety and standards and processes as the structure for appraisal and guidance

EHR-related-Safety-Events-3As we in this part of the world are implementing quality standards from the JCI, appraisal and guidance to focus on and prevent EHR-related Safety Events can be found in the Leadership chapter and the Management of Information chapter found in Joint Commission International Standards for Hospitals, as recommended by these three (3) Consultants.

I like to conclude that while hospitals worldwide are riding the wave of implementing or now expanding on the use of EHRs, it is best to be aware of whatever the contributing factors to EHR-related Safety Events maybe including those identified in this post, and to be accountable to prevent or minimise such events with awareness and the necessary knowledge as outlined by the above mentioned Consultants.

References:

  1. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society(HIMSS) 2015, What is Interoperability?, viewed 18 June 2015, < http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/what-is-interoperability>
  2. HealthITInteroperability 2015, HealthITInteroperability Definitions, viewed 18 June 2015, <http://healthitinteroperability.com/glossary>
  3. James,  S., The Book on Healthcare IT: Volume 2, 2015
  4. Joint Commission International 2015, JCR and JCI Consultants on Reducing and Preventing EHR-related Safety Events, viewed 18 June 2015, <http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/jcr-and-jci-consultants-on-reducing-and-preventing-ehr-related-safety-events/>
  5. Joint Commission International 2013, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 5th edn, JCI, USA
  6. Margret, A., Process Improvement with Electronic Health Records A Stepwise Approach to Workflow and Process Management, 2012, CRC Press, Florida, United States of America
  7. World Health Organisation 2015, Patient safety, viewed 18 June 2015, <http://www.who.int/patientsafety/about/en/>

JCI Standard GLD.3.2 – leadership role in the dynamics of communication within a hospital, Part 2

effective communication

Image credit: Carnegie Speech Company

Effective communication throughout the hospital occurs when individuals possess high-level competency to perform their communications role and when information or meaning has been shared by at least two people.

To perform their communications role with high-level communication competence, they must possess a cluster of related knowledge, skills, and attitudes or motivation. High-level communication competence is to possess the knowledge to know behaviours that are effective and appropriate for a given situation, the skill to apply the behaviour in the given context with the ability to be sensitive to the perspectives of others, and to have the attitudes or motivation to communicate in a competent manner. For example to have the attitude or motivation to communicate in a competent manner when we leave voice mail, the effectiveness of the communication is when two parties (the receiver and the sender) are responsible. The receiver is responsible as he or she responds back to the sender, as the sender cannot know whether the message has been conveyed as intended if there is no feedback from the receiver.

High-level communication competency is also accomplished by choosing communication behaviours that convey messages clearly and precisely, by offering and seeking clarifications to ensure a high probability that messages are interpreted as intended leaving interpretation less open to chance.

We already know that hospitals are most frequently and typically divided into cohesive subgroups such as departments, services, or units for effective and efficient daily delivery of clinical services and management of the hospital as an organisation. These subgroups consist of clinical departments such as medicine, nursing subgroup(s); diagnostic services or departments such as radiology, pharmacy services, and ancillary services such as transportation, among others.

Leadership of these subgroups to collaboratively guide the hospital in meeting the hospital’s mission, strategies, plans, and other relevant information is distributed among a group of leaders collectively accountable for their expectation(s). Each subgroup is managed under the direction of a department/service leader(s) and assisted by a manager(s) as found at most larger hospitals.

Each hospital will have its unique set of hospital leadership individuals with a variety of responsibilities and accountability. Hospital leadership individuals usually consists of an individual to represent the medical staff of the hospital, a chief nursing officer representing all levels of nursing in the hospital, senior administrators, and any other individuals the hospital selects.

In order to set the parameters of effective communication, there must be coordination of clinical services which comes from an understanding of each department’s mission and services and collaboration in developing common policies and procedures, understanding the hospital organisational goals, and to be aware of their responsibilities to patients and other employees among all subgroups of the hospital.

Given this understanding about effective communication within a hospital setting, I think the hospital leadership is the most suitable to be given the responsibility to ensure effective communication throughout the hospital.

In exercising effective communication, the hospital leadership must understand the dynamics of communication between professional groups; between structural units, such as departments; between professional and nonprofessionals groups; between health professionals and management; between health professionals and families; and between health professionals and outside organisations.

One example of facilitating co-ordination between the above mentioned groups is the case in medicine for the patient medical record making information about patients available to the increasing number of personnel involved in treatment and payment. Alison, Jon and Virginia (2010) recognised the importance of medical records which operate as important ‘boundary objects’ crossing “organisational boundaries and which can be accessed by a variety of users, including doctors, reimbursement agents, insurance companies, legal professionals, medical researchers, billing coders, audit contractors, and the patient.” (eds. Alison, Jon and Virginia 2010, p. 134 ). Alison, Jon and Virginia (2010) also noted from findings of a study of record – keeping practices in a psychiatric clinic, that hospitals must enforce ‘institutional accountability’ to ensure their medical records are competent accounts of a given medical encounter. This accountability covers formatting of medical records to widely recognisable standards so that they are recognisable and meaningful to other healthcare professionals and to the increasing number of potential ‘witnesses’ to the event increases when the encounter becomes an accessible record crossing organisational boundaries.

Hospital leadership also serves as role models with the effective communication of the hospital’s mission, strategies, plans, and other relevant information to staff, ensures that processes are in place for communicating relevant information throughout the hospital in a timely manner, and develops a culture that emphasizes cooperation and communication among clinical and non-clinical departments services and individual staff members to coordinate and to integrate patient care.

If you are reading this post as a Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioner department/service leader of your hospital, I am sure you are already automatically selected to be a part of the hospital leadership. This means you need to be trained and learn a cluster of related knowledge, skills, and attitudes or motivation to possess a high-level communication competence for your communications role.

And, if you are indeed this HIM / MR practitioner I referred to above and working at at a hospital which is already Joint Commission International Accreditation (JCI) accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for accreditation status, then you need to be aware that you will no longer be working with the “Management of Communication and Information (MCI)” team of your hospital to coordinate and monitor the JCI Standard MCI.4 and Standard MCI.5, simply because the MCI Chapter not found in the 5th edition JCI as it was in the previous edition (4th edition). The MCI Chapter is now known as the “Management of Information” (MOI) chapter in the 5th edition as I have posted in the post JCI Standard GLD.3.2 – leadership role in the dynamics of communication within a hospital, Part 1 (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window).

To reiterate, the Standard MCI.5 now combines with MCI.4 in the Governance, Leadership, and Direction (GLD) chapter of the 5th edition “to better align hospital leadership requirements; revises standard, intent, and MEs to clarify expectations” (JCI 2013, p.161) to form the Standard GLD.3.2 in the 5th edition which states that “Hospital leadership ensures effective communication throughout the hospital.

Perhaps you as a HIM /MR practitioner have been recently active in ensuring effective communication in your hospital as been part of (i) formal activities for example as a leader or member of standing committees and joint teams, and (ii) informal activities for example publishing newsletters and posters as methods, for promoting communication among services and individual staff members of the hospital.

References:

  1. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA
  2. Joint Commission International, 2013, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 5th edn, JCI, USA
  3. Pamela McHugh, S & Linda.N., 2010, Communication for nurses : how to prevent harmful events and promote patient safety, F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  4. Ricky, WG & Gregory, M, 2014, Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations, 11th edn,, South-Western, Cengage Learning, Mason, OH, USA
  5. Alison, P, Jon, H & Virginia, TG (eds), 2010, Communication in healthcare settings : policy, participation, and new technologies, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, United Kingdom

The Medical Records Review Form flipbook

MRRF-5edn-flip-book-front-coverThe Medical Records Review Form found in the Joint Commission International’s (JCI) Hospital Survey Process Guide, 5th Edition, effective 1 April 2014 manual, is now available as a flipbook.

Goto THE DOWNLOAD LIST sub-menu item page under the RESOURCES menu item to view and/or download this flipbook.

Patient Medical Record Review Form – JCI Hospital Survey Process Guide, 5th Edition, Part 3

To conclude the series of posts on the Patient Medical Record Review Form (MRRF) found in the Joint Commission International (JCI) Hospital Survey Process Guide (HSPG), Fifth Edition manual, I like to present two (2) more infographics showing the remaining thirty-nine (39) JCI Hospital Accreditation Standards (HAS), Fifth Edition from the total of 61 JCI HAS, Fifth Edition found in the MRRF.

The post Patient Medical Record Review Form – JCI Hospital Survey Process Guide, 5th Edition, Part 1 (the link will open in a new tab of your current browser window) brought you the infographic showing the first set of twenty-two (22) JCI HAS represented by 22 football players played by Team A versus Team B on a football pitch.

As you will know from reading Part 1 of this series of posts, I had decided then to graphically represent a total of 61 JCI HAS found in this form as Infographics showing a football match played by two teams each consisting of not more than eleven players (standards) – one of whom is the goalkeeper, using the 4-2-3-1 formation.

To continue the series of infographics to show the remaining JCI HAS from the total of 61 JCI HSA, below is an infographic showing some twenty-two (22) JCI HAS from the remaining 39 JCI HAS of the total of 61 JCI HAS found in the Patient MMRF. In this infographic, I have shown these 22 JCI HAS represented by 22 football players, 11 players on either side of Team C and Team D. Click on the image which will open a new tab of your current browser window, and to view a larger image just click on the magnifying glass which appears over the image.

MMRF-football-pitch-Team-C-vs-Team-DThe infographic below shows some seventeen (17) JCI HAS minus the 22 JCI HAS (used for Team C and Team D as described above) from the remaining 39 JCI HAS of the total of 61 JCI HAS found in the Patient MMRF. In this infographic, I have shown these 17 JCI HAS represented by 17 football players, nine (9) players on Team E and eight (8) players on Team D. I am applying The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) Law 3 – the number of players which states that “A match is played by two teams, each consisting of not more than eleven players, one of whom is the goalkeeper. A match may not start if either team consists of fewer than seven players.”. Click on the image which will open a new tab of your current browser window, and to view a larger image just click on the magnifying glass which appears over the image.

MMRF-football-pitch-Team-E-vs-Team-FTo end, you can view a sample of this particular form from this link which will open in a new tab of your current window) as recommended in the JCI’s HSPG, 5th Edition, effective 1 April 2014.

References:

  1. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA
  2. Joint Commission International, 2013, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 5th edn, JCI, USA
  3. Joint Commission International, 2010, Hospital Survey Process Guide (HSPG), 4thd edn, JCI, USA
  4. Joint Commission International, 2014, Hospital Survey Process Guide (HSPG), 5th edn, JCI, USA
Page-&-Post-footer