EHR-related Safety Events

Hospitals around the globe are fast implementing or are now expanding on the use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The notion is that hospitals are able to provide better quality of care and at the same time, ensure improved productivity for providers with computer equipment hosting the EHRs.

While we watch the whole world marching onwards in implementation and expansion of EHRs, readers are reminded of the aspects of patient safety as defined by the World Health Organisation, which is to prevent errors and adverse effects to patients that are associated with health care.  Safety is what patients, families, staff, and the public are likely to expect when they are at hospitals. Thus the safety net must not only safeguard patients but staff caring for the patients and visitors to hospitals. As such, safety controls from hazards or risks posed by buildings, grounds, and equipment (JCI 2013) such as computers and EHRs to patients, families, staff, and the public must be in place at hospitals to prevent safety related events.

In this post I have summarised graphically into three (3) charts contributing factors for EHR-related Safety Events and on how to prevent, mitigate, and react to them. The facts presented in the charts are based on the opinions given by three (3) Joint Commission Resources (JCR) and JCI consultants on the ever-increasing EHR lawsuits in the United States between 2013 and 2014, as was reported recently in Becker’s Health IT and CIO Review.

The Charts 1 and 2 show eight (8) common causes of EHR-related safety events as follows:

  1. user error
  2. EHR builds
  3. workflows
  4. limited EHR interoperability across all three levels of health information technology interoperability i.e. foundational, structural and semantic levels
  5. deficient provider EHR education
  6. poor post-deployment vendor or institutional support
  7. losing sight of EHR best practices
  8. organisations that do not have a well-organised paper medical record cannot describe what they want in an EHR thus leading to work arounds 

EHR-related-Safety-Events-1

EHR-related-Safety-Events-2Chart 3 presents six (6) ideas on what can be done to decrease the number of EHR-related safety mistakes which are:

  1. need to make end users aware of the potential this technology has to contribute to safety events
  2. encourage the reporting of events that may be related to EHRs
  3. if an EHR-related safety event occurs, the event should be analysed
  4. resources should be available to address post go-live optimization
  5. third party consultants
  6. use patient safety and standards and processes as the structure for appraisal and guidance

EHR-related-Safety-Events-3As we in this part of the world are implementing quality standards from the JCI, appraisal and guidance to focus on and prevent EHR-related Safety Events can be found in the Leadership chapter and the Management of Information chapter found in Joint Commission International Standards for Hospitals, as recommended by these three (3) Consultants.

I like to conclude that while hospitals worldwide are riding the wave of implementing or now expanding on the use of EHRs, it is best to be aware of whatever the contributing factors to EHR-related Safety Events maybe including those identified in this post, and to be accountable to prevent or minimise such events with awareness and the necessary knowledge as outlined by the above mentioned Consultants.

References:

  1. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society(HIMSS) 2015, What is Interoperability?, viewed 18 June 2015, < http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/what-is-interoperability>
  2. HealthITInteroperability 2015, HealthITInteroperability Definitions, viewed 18 June 2015, <http://healthitinteroperability.com/glossary>
  3. James,  S., The Book on Healthcare IT: Volume 2, 2015
  4. Joint Commission International 2015, JCR and JCI Consultants on Reducing and Preventing EHR-related Safety Events, viewed 18 June 2015, <http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/jcr-and-jci-consultants-on-reducing-and-preventing-ehr-related-safety-events/>
  5. Joint Commission International 2013, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 5th edn, JCI, USA
  6. Margret, A., Process Improvement with Electronic Health Records A Stepwise Approach to Workflow and Process Management, 2012, CRC Press, Florida, United States of America
  7. World Health Organisation 2015, Patient safety, viewed 18 June 2015, <http://www.who.int/patientsafety/about/en/>

Understanding reasons for making a request to change the medical record

It is rare to find any research topic ever published on why requests are made by patients who want to make changes to their medical record. I found one recently, and here to share with you what researchers discovered as the main reasons for making a request to change the medical record, and what types of information they wanted changed, and whether they result in modifications to the medical record.

In their qualitative research, the researchers studied content analysis of all patient-initiated amendment requests, an ‘amendment request’ defined as the process by which patients ask for changes to be made to their records, received over a 7-year period.

Readers can now view the infographic below (click on the infographic to view a larger image in a new tab of your current window) which shows a summary of all relevant findings from this research.

Medical-Records-Amendment-Requests-Study

Also from this study, I deduced that when patients were given the opportunity to further participate in their care by allowing them to review their medical record, their medical record accuracy could lead to improvement after the identification and correction of errors or omissions.

I agree with the authors that doctors can make mistakes in the medical record, and that it is necessary to correct these mistakes at some point This is especially true when a patient discovers any mistake or omission upon reviewing his or her own medical record. However, it is uncommon when a patient will not want any information there anyway but such requests must be expected.

An ‘amendment request’ is a rare request as most patients, in the developing and under-developed world and even perhaps in the developed countries are unaware of the basic right to review their own medical record and the absence of any policy to grant patients the right to make an ‘amendment request’.

References:

  1. David A Hanauer, Rebecca Preib, Kai Zheng, Sung W Choi 2014, Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests, J Am Med Inform Assoc amiajnl-2013-002574 Published Online First: 26 May 2014 doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002574, viewed 1 June 2014, <http://medicalresearch.com/author-interviews/electronic-medical-records-study-examines-patient-initiated-amendment-requests/5721/>
Page-&-Post-footer

A doctor’s touch vs documentation and fitting things into boxes on computer screens

Writing narratives in paper based medical records is the usual way the team of healthcare professionals taking care of the patient – doctors and nurses largely record in the medical record to tell a story about what is happening to the patient and what occurred in the course of care. Such narratives are considered to be essential for communication between members of  healthcare professionals.

Following the advent of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) / Electronic Health Record (EHR), doctors and nurses find the loss of space in the patient record to write narratives. The freedom of being able to describe something in a doctor’s or nurse’s own words is now replaced by structured drop-down menus, a prominent feature of EMRs / EHRs.

I like to share an essay, “Checking Boxes” about the frustrations and misgivings of a primary-care doctor who makes house calls in and around Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States of America. Read this essay here.

The notion is that many caring doctors and nurses still wish to spend their time speaking and caring for patients rather than been overwhelmed with computer documentation and fitting things into boxes on computer screens.

References:

Regina, H 2013, Checking Boxes, 18 October 2013, Pulse–voices from the heart of medicine, viewed 27 Nov 2013, <http://www.pulsemagazine.org/archive/stories/310-checking-boxes>

Findings revealing workarounds to overcome design flaws in electronic health records (EHRs)

A new study in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), which directly observed clinical workflows at primary care clinics in different healthcare organisations in Boston and Indianapolis, USA found that both doctors and medical staff used both paper-based and computer-based workarounds to overcome design flaws in their electronic health records (EHRs).

Here are some examples from the study’s findings of workarounds created when practices are found not using the EHR in the way it was designed for, due to the real and perceived deficiencies ot the EHRs.

workarounds-for-EHR-flaws

References:

  1. Ken, T, 2013, Healthcare Workarounds Expose EHR Flaws, InformationWeek Healthcare, viewed 26 March 2013, < http://www.informationweek.com/healthcare/electronic-medical-records/healthcare-workarounds-expose-ehr-flaws/240151710 >

Nation-wide electronic patient record for Poland

Poland will implement a comprehensive web-based electronic patient
record (EPR) project which is in its beginning phase and a comprehensive introduction will be available starting in 2014. Read more about this project from this link (this link will open in a new tab in your current browser). This press release from CompuGroup Medical AG, Poland was received via email courtesy of Arunasalam P., Malaysia.