JCI Standard GLD.3.2 – leadership role in the dynamics of communication within a hospital, Part 1

This afternoon, I am to write about the Joint Commission International (JCI) Management of Communication and Information (MCI) Standard MCI.5 which states that “The leaders ensure that there is effective communication and coordination among those individuals and departments responsible for providing clinical services.”

HomeImage-DavisTaylor

Image credit: http://www.danieldecker.net/

Surely, the Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioner’s practice is not responsible for providing clinical services, thus Standard MCI.5 will definitely not require any HIM / MR practitioner to comply with it.

However because Standard MCI.5 is included among other standards found in the MCI Chapter of the JCI manual (4th edition) that mostly apply to the practice of HIM / MR (all of which I have completed posting on this blog), I still wish to write about this standard so that HIM / MR practitioners will be aware and also that they will appreciate the ongoing communication and coordination among those individuals and departments responsible for providing clinical services in a typical hospital setting. A HIM / MR practitioner will perhaps then understand and appreciate the demand for medical records use in the dissemination of patient care information among fellow colleagues operating from different departments responsible for providing clinical services.

From the post The JCI Manuals, 5th Edition are effective 1 April 2014  (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window), readers will now know that hospitals need to begin to focus their hospital accreditation program based on the 5th edition of the JCI international standards for hospitals.

Examining this 5th edition of the JCI international standards for hospitals, I found that there are many changes to this 5th edition of the hospital manual. Expect to find requirement changes that “raise the bar” on compliance expectations in addition to finding more clarity over and above nearly all of the text that appeared in the 4th edition.

One major change I found on further examination of the 5th edition is that you can no longer find the MCI Chapter in the 5th edition. The “Management of Communication and Information” (MCI) in the previous edition (4th edition) is now known as the “Management of Information” (MOI) chapter (5th edition).

Nonetheless, I looked for the Standard MCI.5 in the MOI chapter of the 5th edition, but it was no longer there among the rewritten MOI chapter. Delving deeper, I found that Standard MCI.5 is now moved and consolidated with similar requirements of Standards, and in this case to the “Governance, Leadership, and Direction” (GLD) chapter in the 5th edition.

The Standard MCI.5 now combines with MCI.4 (also from the 4th edition) in the GLD chapter of the 5th edition “to better align hospital leadership requirements; revises standard, intent, and MEs to clarify expectations” (JCI 2013, p.161) to form the Standard GLD.3.2 in the 5th edition which states that “Hospital leadership ensures effective communication throughout the hospital. “

I shall be writing about the Standard GLD.3.2 of the 5th edition in the next part. What I plan to write in this next part will also relate to the Standard MCI.4 which states that “Communication is effective throughout the organization.” which I have already posted in the post JCI Standard MCI.4 – accuracy and timeliness of information in the hospital through effective communication (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window).

References:

  1. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA
  2. Joint Commission International, 2013, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 5th edn, JCI, USA

The JCI Manuals, 5th Edition are effective 1 April 2014

JCIH14EBJCIHSPG14Joint Commission International (JCI) Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, 5th Edition and The Joint Commission International Accreditation Hospital Survey Process Guide, 5th Edition are both now effective starting 1 April 2014.

JCI claims that the Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, 5th Edition is trimmed to contain lesser standards, has better structure and logical flow between standards requirements, and now incorporates two new chapters to cater for Academic Medical Center Hospitals

The JCI Accreditation Hospital Survey Process Guide, 5th Edition manual like the previous edition is designed to help hospitals learn about and be better prepared for the JCI survey process. However, it now contains help for Academic Medical Center Hospitals prepare for their surveys.

References:

  1. Joint Commission International, 2014, viewed 30 March 2014, <http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/>

MRPM.VOW.01.14: Why EMR is a dirty word to many doctors when implementing the EMR

MRPM-VOW-placer-video-projector-icon-psd

The first 2014 week’s Video of the Week (VOW) pick is about what the hopes and fears of doctors with implementing Electronic Medical Records (EMRs).

In this video watch a parody in which Hitler portrays a physician struggling to implement an EMR,.some of these fears were related to for example lack of ICT skills and training and resistance of change (old habits making doctors prefer the manual system in conjunction with lack of motivation and encouragement).

References:

  1. Implementing the EMR, 10 September 2012, Youtube, viewed 28 January 2014, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_xRCtP8ctY>

APDC: Relevant conditions and scenarios that affects the eyes – Part 3

ICD-10-book-cover-for-APDC-series-labelAs always when I present any coding lecture, I will stick to my style in this post as well firstly to describe (i) the basic anatomy of the visual system and its connections, (ii) explain how this “machinery” functions to produce vision. (iii) what happens when this “machinery” malfunctions and (iv) end with the appropriate International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, 2010 edition,  (ICD-10) codes to apply along with any peculiarities and nuances, if any. However, I will be brief as possible with (i), (ii) and (iii) for posts like this one so as not to be too lengthy and burdensome to the reader passing through this website-blog.

My plan is to discuss conditions affecting the ocular muscles, disorders of refraction and accommodation, visual disturbances  and cover visual impairment and blindness in this post.

We normally gaze with each eye coming to the same point in space, that is to say that the eyes are aligned in the same direction. This is called binocular vision.  Coordinated eye movements also allows us the ability to see in 3-D. All this is possible with the aid of the extraocular muscles  around the eyes.

Problems arise when there is lack of coordination between eyes where the eyes are not parallel and not aligned with one another. They then prevent the gaze of each eye to enable binocular vision and affecting depth perception (3-D vision). One or both eyes may turn inward, and the patient is cross-eyed. He or she will have double vision and/or there is visual loss in one eye without the ability to see in 3-D. One or both eyes may also turn out, especially seen in paediatric cases.

Conditions affecting the ocular muscles affecting binocular movement include strabismus. Forms of strabismus include esotropia characterised by a turning inward of one or both eyes and exotropia when the eye is turned out.

Strabismus in ICD-10 is part of the disorders of ocular muscles affecting binocular movement. It is grouped under the ICD-10 codes block of H49 to H52. However, the classification of strabismus in ICD-10 is differentiated by the category H50 for all conditions that involves lack of coordination between the extraocular muscles affecting binocular movement and another category H40 which is for conditions caused by the paralysis of the lateral rectus muscle. Within the category H50, ICD-10 provides codes for the different types of esotropia and exotropia, i.e monocular, alternating and intermittent. H51 is the third category for all other disorders of binocular movement.

Myopia, also called nearsightedness and hypermetropia, also called farsightedness are common disorders of refraction and accommodation. Disorders of refraction and accommodation would not be complete if I do not mention here about astigmatism and presbyopia. The category H52 includes myopia, hypermetropia, astigmatism and presbyopia among others.

Many conditions listed under visual disturbances in ICD-10 can be symptoms of another condition, for example vascular disease, diabetes and congenital conditions.

Amblyopia (also known as ‘lazy eye’, is loss of vision in an eye which is otherwise healthy), blurred vision (patient suffers a loss of sharpness of vision and the inability to see small details), diplopia (double vision) causing a patient to see two objects instead of one and scotomas (blind spots) are areas in the field of vision that have been partially altered resulting in an area of partially diminished or entirely deteriorated visual acuity, surrounded by a normal field of vision.

Blurred vision is reported under code H53.8 Other visual disturbances, unlike all the other specified visual disturbances each with a separate ICD-10 code.

Do take note that the code for scintillating scotoma is not found under the subcategory H53.4 Visual field defects along with other types of scotomas, but you will find it is listed under subjective visual disturbances with the ICD-10 code H53.1

Before I go on to relate ICD-10 codes relevant to visual Impairment and blindness, I think it is worthwhile to understand the word perception in relation to the eye.

Martin (2008, p.180) explains that perception “is an internal representation of our external environment.” When a person becomes aware of, knows, or identifies an object by means of the senses (in this case the eyes), this act or faculty of perceiving, or apprehending by means of the senses or of the mind, cognition, and understanding is said to be visual perception. One hypothesis according to Martin (2008) is called ‘what’ vs. ‘how’ which postulates  that the visual system is divided into two or more streams of information. The ‘what’ pathway mediates the conscious recognition of objects and scenes. The ‘how’ pathway provides visuospatial information (ability to process and interpret visual information about where objects are in space) directly into the motor systems (the part of the central nervous system that is involved with movement) to guide our actions. Thus, different aspects of visual perceptions such as movement, depth, colour and shape are processed separately.

When a patient lacks in visual perception due to physiological or neurological factors, they are considered to have a form of visual impairment or blindness . Visual impairment is a chronic visual deficit situation when a patient complains that every day functioning is impaired. Eyeglasses or contact lenses cannot correct this impairment.

Total blindness is the other situation when there is a complete lack of form and there is no visual light perception.

Visual impairment including blindness in ICD-10 is classified to H54. A table below H54 gives a classification of severity of visual impairment. The definitions of codes, for example “Visual impairment category 5” is the definition for the code H54.0 Blindness, binocular is referred from this table. From the table, total blindness must be coded to H54.0 since the patient’s vision is deficit due to no visual light perception and because the definition of code H54.0 is “Visual impairment category 5”

In the next post, let’s examine (i) the two categories in the other disorders block of codes, nystagmus and other irregular eye movements and intraoperative and postoperative complications, (ii) conditions affecting the eyes that originate during the perinatal period, and (iii) traumatic injuries of the eye and ocular adnexa.

References:

  1. Gerard, JT & Bryan, D 2012, Principles of Anatomy & Physiology, 13th edn, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, USA
  2. Martin, JT 2008, An Introduction to the Visual System,  2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  3. Michael, M & Valerie, OL 2012, Human anatomy, 3rd edn, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, USA
  4. Phillip, T 2012, Seeley’s principles of anatomy & physiology, 2nd edn, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, USA
  5. World Health Organization 2011, Volume 1 Tabular list, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, 2010 edn, Geneva, Switzerland

MRPM.VOW.04.13: Technology Outook 2020 Healthcare – Global Megatrends

MRPM-VOW-placer-video-projector-icon-psd

Whenever I associate with the word megatrends, my first thoughts connects to my encounter with John Naisbitt’s 1982 best-seller Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives. He is an American author and public speaker in the area of futures studies. He had first invented the concept of “Megatrends” in 1980, and in his book Megatrends, you can discover megatrends defined as a general shift in thinking or approach affecting countries, industries and organisations.

This week’s Video of the Week (VOW) pick is about global megatrends and technologies that will be pertinent to the healthcare sector in 2020, at least to the minds of the guys at DNV Research and Innovation (DNVR&I), the corporate DNV(Det Norske Veritas) unit of DNV GL.

In this video watch how seven (7) global megatrends and technologies are predicted to define the healthcare landscape by 2020. The megatrends that are likely to define the general shift in approach in the management of patient and disease management you will watch in this video are:

  1. The implementation of Information Technology (IT) (i) to drive appropriate standards for healthcare information and systems i.e interoperability to facilitate disparate data streams and clinical workflows into a single smart system, (ii) promote the adoption of integrated electronic health records (EHRs), (iii) enable the systematic and exchange of specific data in a electronic traceability system for example use of bar codes, and (iv) a computerised clinical decision support system to provide “just in time, just for me” support at the point-of-care, thereby improving patient safety and quality of care;
  2. The Internet to enable information sharing via online social networking, virtual reality to facilitate new approaches to continuous education and training, information retrieval to make well-informed decisions for sharing knowledge across communities, and finally to enabling and allowing patients to record and access their own health data;
  3. Moving healthcare delivery setting from high-cost hospitals and into alternative and low-cost arenas i.e to provide remote care services via telemedicine, monitoring of patients in their own homes using medical sensors e.g.electrodes for sensing and recording of an electrocardiogram (ECG), ultra-wideband radar for remote monitoring of vital body functions like breathing, and smartphone applications for better communication between staff, and between healthcare providers and patients so that patients can access their healthcare information, actively participate in their own care and maintain contact with their healthcare provider;
  4. New technology applied at point-of-care i.e moving the technology like portable ultrasound, lab-on-a-chip technologies, nucleic acid identification to reduce spread of disease by early diagnosis and surveillance, and use of portable micro-nuclear magnetic resonance to improve speed and accuracy of cancer diagnosis;
  5. Personalised Medicine to switch healthcare from “one size fits all” to “tailor made ” management of disease as the field of genomics matures to enable more research into the impact of DNA sequencing in clinical use, genome based diagnostics to support the specific diagnosis or treatment of an individual using DNA sequencing information, pharmacogenetics as early warning indicators of drug metabolism and molecular pharmacology, and cancer genomics for diagnostic purposes and to guide treatment;
  6. New generation imaging from current technologies that provide good anatomical and structural images to emerging techniques like diffuse optical imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and new contrast agents to enable early detection of disease and monitoring of treatment; use of positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI for example in diagnostics and monitoring of neurogenerative diseases, mathematical modelling and simulation to detect abnormal cell growth earlier, and protein analysis for example in the management of cancer to distinguish between patients with poor and good prognosis using  imaging mass spectrometry; and
  7. Novel medical treatment to improve treatment and management of disease through continuous research and innovation to produce a myriad of technologies like MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound to eliminate the need for invasive procedures, cancer vaccines, robotic surgery, nanotechnology, and novel approaches to developing antibiotics to combat the increasing trend of bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics, to name some of them.

References:

  1. DNV GL, Technology Outlook 2020 Healthcare, viewed 21 December 2013, <http://issuu.com/dnv.com/docs/technology_outlook_2020_health>
  2. Healthcare Technology Outlook 2020 – Technology uptake, 3 February 2012, Youtube, viewed 21 December 2013, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=totMfYaq8O8&feature=youtu.be>