Never miss out an adverse event in the medical record!

A hospital will normally have a policy that identifies all adverse effects that are to be documented in a medical record and those that must be reported to the hospital’s authorities within a specified time frame. An adverse event is defined as “an unanticipated, undesirable, or potentially dangerous adverse effect occurrence” in a hospital (JCI ASH p.246).

Patients are reassessed to determine their response to treatment on medications since they may suffer adverse effects like allergic responses, unanticipated drug/drug interactions, or a change in their equilibrium raising their risk of falls. Therefore, patients are constantly monitored for medication effects including adverse effects through the collaborative efforts between patients themselves, their doctors, nurses, and other health care practitioners (i) to evaluate the medication’s effect on the patient’s symptoms or illness, as well as blood count, renal function, liver function, and other monitoring with select medications, (ii) to observe the patient for adverse effects, and (iii) to record in the patient’s medical record any adverse effect(s).

This monitoring process is normally a proactive approach to risk management of a hospital with a formalised program of risk management to investigate and to reduce identified, unanticipated adverse events and other safety risks to patients and staff.

The accreditation process is well known as an effective quality evaluation and management tool designed to create a culture of safety and quality within a hospital. One of the benefits of accreditation is it strives to continually improve patient care processes and results.

If your hospital is already Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation status, then the basics of data gathering and preparation includes selection of measures, data collection and aggregation, data analysis and interpretation, dissemination/transmission of findings, taking action, monitoring performance/improvement are all integral to improving safety and quality of care at your hospital. Medication management data collection issues are either addressed during the System Tracer (Data Use) as a shorter survey or during the full System Tracer – Medication Management survey.

I like to draw your attention when individuals like you as a Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioner may be roped in as part of the hospital’s group of participants during the System Tracer (Data Use) survey since you could be considered as “Individuals who are knowledgeable about the information systems available for data collection, analysis, and reporting” (JCI HSPG p.74) or excluded if a shorter survey just for medication management data collection issues are to addressed.

Do take note too that if you are at a hospital which is already JCI accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation status, the Medical Record Review Tool (MMRT).will now check for compliance of the JCI Standard MMU.7 which states that “Medication effects on patients are monitored.”, which this post is all about.

Readers, this post on the JCI Standard MMU.7 and all the rest of the standards I have posted using the JCI Hospital Accreditation Standards 4th Edition, concludes all of the necessary and mandatory documentation standards that must be included in a complete medical record. For hospitals not yet on the JCI journey, I think applying all the standards that are mandatory documentation standards using the JCI Hospital Accreditation Standards 4th Edition augurs for high quality medical records documentation standards at any hospital.

References:

  1. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals (ASH), 4th edn, JCI, USA
  2. Joint Commission International, 2010, Hospital Survey Process Guide (HSPG), 4th edn, JCI, USA

MRPM.VOW.03.13: Electronic Medical Records: Their Time Has Not Yet Come?

MRPM-VOW-placer-video-projector-icon-psdIt’s the third week of December 2013 already, and the Video of the Week (VOW) pick is this “silent movie” on the downside of using paper-based medical records, like many still keep in most developing and developed economies versus the merits of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs).

Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) Management practitioners in most developing and developed economies are far away from the turbulence In the United States, when health care providers are forced by mandatory legislation to transform medical records from paper-based to electronic. In this state of disquietness, the U.S Government provides incentives like monetary bonuses toward those who make the conversion early and fulfil a level of computer utilisation termed “meaningful use while for those who do not adopt EMRs by 2015, there will be disincentives.

This video illustrates a much less optimistic view about paper-based medical records and encourages the change showing that electronic records are more secure, that preventive measures could be better implemented electronically, and that health records could be shared across providers, thus avoiding duplication of testing and contesting that these assumptions are true and that medical quality could be improved while costs would decrease.

HIM / MR practitioners who have undergone this kind of transformation are the ones who can determine, testify and so conclude if (i) smaller, paper-based medical systems offered greater flexibility and efficiency than larger electronic systems, (ii) whether electronic records were more or less secure than paper records, and (iii) whether the theoretical benefits of an electronic record had not matched its actual performance, rather a performance that increases costs but detracts from clinical efficiencies and does nothing to improve patient outcomes.

Although this video is almost five (5) years old, I decided to use this video for the benefit of HIM / MR practitioners in developing countries where many may still be unaware about the adoption of EMRs as a new technology that may or may not be good enough to warrant an  enthusiasm for change In health care and their everyday practice in medical records keeping.

References:

Allscripts.com/ 2008, Paperfree Healthcare, 22 February 2008, Youtube, viewed 13 December 2013, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jAH9hdF0xk>

MRPM.VOW.02.13: Electronic Medical Records Kill!

MRPM-VOW-placer-video-projector-icon-psdMy Video of the Week (VOW) pick this second week of December 2013 is this humorous animation from Steven Mussey, M.D. about Electronic Medical Records (EMRs).

This animation poses fore·thoughts in investing in EMRs, but I think it is not a  “menace” if handled with care and used as a productivity tool. EMRs can save lifes actually,  I bet EMRs will greatly reduce or eliminate medical errors on the part of dcotors and nurses because of the built-in decision support systems.

I think it’s time we all move on with the times and learn to accept that there are certain aspects in healthcare that can actually be computerised, specifically the paper based medical record. But the greater interface with the EMR, I believe that the most important thing is to never forget to care for the patient holistically and that healthcare professionals need to continue to talk to patient face-to-face.

Just have fun with this VOW and laugh away you worry that EMRs will kill you!

References:

Steven, M 2011,   Electronic Medical Records Kill!, 9 Apr 2011, Youtube, viewed 05 December 2013,<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NleWPN6CADE&list=PLGB4ZNdlXswnQWZR1mQgS4xu6BGQbJl96>

APDC: Relevant conditions and scenarios that affects the eyes – Part 2

ICD-10-book-cover-for-APDC-series-labelAs I wrote some weeks ago in the post APDC: Relevant conditions and scenarios that affects the eyes – Part 1 (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window), in this new instalment post of coding diseases of the eye and adnexa, I shall discuss about cataracts affecting the lens, conditions affecting the choroid and retina, on to glaucoma characterised by damage of the optic nerve, and to end this post with some conditions affecting the vitreous body and globe and their appropriate coding.

ICD 10 has one (1) block ranging from codes H25-H28 for all disorders of lens within the Chapter VII Diseases of the eye and adnexa (H00-H59). Within this block, a Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioner  will find four (4) sub-divisions (subcategories) of three (3) category categories of codes. The first sub-division H25 is for the single condition affecting the older population group – the senile cataract, three-character categories which I believe have been selected or grouped because of their frequency, severity or susceptibility to public health intervention.  The second, third and fourth sub-divisions i.e H26, H27 and H28 are grouped among diseases with some common characteristic as well as allowing many different but rarer conditions. As always there is a provision for ‘other’ conditions to be classified. Do take note that H25 to H27 each has a category for ‘unspecified’ conditions.

The results from the last known national eye survey conducted in 1996 to determine the prevalence of blindness and low vision and their major causes among the Malaysian population of all ages, cataract was the leading cause of blindness (39%) followed by retinal diseases (24%) and another result finding showed that uncorrected refractive errors (48%) and cataract (36%) were the major causes of low vision.

When coding cataracts in the young population, cataracts present at birth takes it place among the codes in the Chapter XVII Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities (Q00-Q99). Code H26.0 is only for cataracts diagnosed until later in life of new-borns namely infantile cataracts present early in life, but are not present at birth. Also take note that the subcategory for infantile and juvenile cataracts includes the descriptor presenile.

Cataracts caused by an underlying inflammatory disorder example cataract in chronic iridocyclitis are included in the category “Complicated cataract (H26.2)”.  Remember the option to use additional external cause code (Chapter XX), if desired, to identify drug in the case for drug-induced cataract or if desired, to identify cause in the case for traumatic cataract.

Two codes are required  for diabetic cataract, a special coding condition, whereby the coder has to go elsewhere to find the code for the underlying generalised disease and also report the code H28.0 since diabetic cataract is indeed a manifestation in a particular organ or site, in this case the eye and specifically the lens. This is the principle of the dagger and asterisk system which provides alternative classifications. Always code the primary code for the underlying disease which will be marked with a dagger (†) and code the optional additional code for the manifestation to be marked with an asterisk (*), in this case H28.0 The eye specialties everywhere normally have a desire to see diabetic cataract classified to the Chapter VII for this manifestation when it was the reason for medical care.

Now, for example when the diabetes is not identified as type 2? How do you code?

Rationally, I would code to E11.3 as the dagger code because of the following connection which is (i) you are directed from H28.0* – diabetic cataract to go to the block E10-E14 with common fourth character .3+, (ii) then I look up the block diabetes mellitus (E10-E14) from the Chapter IV Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (E00-E90), I find first “With ophthalmic complications, Diabetic: .3+, cataract (H28.0*) as among a list of fourth-character subdivisions for use with categories E10-E14 and type II, a inclusion term is listed below E11, and finally, (iii) since the coder is required to “See before E10 for subdivisions”. In summary, the asterisk code H28.0* leads me to find E11.3 from the above mentioned connection.

The category H33 lists codes regarding retinal detachments, when the retina is pulled or lifted away from its normal position. When there is a retinal break, detachment may or may not happen. Horseshoe tear, a type of retinal detachment with no retinal break is quite commonly reported and is given the code H33.3

What if you are presented with the main term “congenital macular degeneration” as the diagnosis? How will you find the correct code? You could look at congenital first, and you will be directed to find the condition. The condition is macular degeneration. Finding macular, you will locate degeneration (H35.3), and then to find hereditary (H35.5) at the second level.  This is the way your find your way in the Alphabetic Index forest of codes.

Glaucoma is another serious condition of the eye, actually it is a group of diseases of the eyes characterised by damage of the optic nerve which can lead to permanent damage to the optic nerve, loss of peripheral vision, and eventually, blindness. You may encounter some that are chronic and some that are acute while coding glaucoma.

In ICD 10, glaucoma that is described as congenital glaucoma is reported with a code from glaucoma described as childhood, infantile, juvenile, or congenital are all reported as congenital glaucoma with a code from Chapter XVII Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities (Q00-Q99) unlike in the past revision, ICD 9 when glaucoma that is described as childhood, infantile, or juvenile is reported with a code from the Chapter 6 – Nervous System and Sense Organ.

Glaucoma may be secondary to eye trauma,  eye inflammation, to other eye disorders and maybe even drugs. You may use the additional code, if desired, to identify cause or use the additional external cause code (Chapter XX), if desired, to identify drug.

You may not find any specific code for glaucoma associated with vascular disorders this time around in ICD 10, and the likely code to pick will be H40.8 Other glaucoma.

Endophthalmitis is to me the most common condition I had encountered for all conditions affecting the globe, affecting multiple structures of the eye, such as inflammation, degenerative conditions, and retained foreign bodies. Infact the inclusion clause “disorders affecting multiple structures of eye” included below H44 Disorders of globe already confirms this. By the way, endophthalmitis is an inflammatory condition within the intraocular cavities affecting the aqueous or vitreous humor. However, the ICD 10 does not differentiate between the terms acute, chronic, and unspecified endophthalmitis anymore but you can look up the Alphabetic Index and locate the qualifying terms like acute and subacute listed there under the lead term endophthalmitis, and the go find the appropriate code H44.0 Purulent endophthalmitis.

Coding vitreous haemorrhage in ICD 10 has changed, it now stands alone as H43.1, unlike in ICD 9.

Incidentally I have delayed writing this kind of posts as it required pulling together all my resources, understanding all the diseases and conditions in this Chapter, and finally a desirable post for the reader I wish to convince into reading a technical post like this one.

Readers, I think I have not more than three (3) more instalment posts on coding diseases of the eye and adnexa.

Happy coding!

References:

  1. Gerard, JT & Bryan, D 2012, Principles of Anatomy & Physiology, 13th edn, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, USA
  2. Michael, M & Valerie, OL 2012, Human anatomy, 3rd edn, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, USA
  3. Phillip, T 2012, Seeley’s principles of anatomy & physiology, 2nd edn, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, USA
  4. World Health Organization 2011, Volume 1 Tabular list, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, 2010 edn, Geneva, Switzerland
  5. Zainal, M, Ismail, SM, Ropilah, AR, Elias, H, Arumugam, G, Alias, G, Fathilah, J, Lim, TO, Ding, LM and Goh, PP 2002, Prevalence of blindness and low vision in Malaysian population: results from the National Eye Survey 1996, British Journal of Ophthalmology, September; 86(9): 951–956.viewed 27 Nov 2013, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771293/>

MRPM.VOW.01.13: Google Glass in a clinical setting

MRPM-VOW-placer-video-projector-icon-psdGoogle Glasses is a battery operated, capable for hands-free use while walking or driving or working, head-mounted intelligent device that looks like a pair of normal eye glasses. Google Glasses are equipped with lenses that are both interactive and a display like a smartphone. Users will always be connected to the Internet, it is compatible with both Android-powered mobile devices and Apple iOS-powered devices through Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity. Users can also record photo or video from its 5 megapixel camera by voice command.

The MRPM Video of the Week (MRPM.VOW.01.13) – from the widget on the left of this post, provides pellucidity to an innovative way for quick and easy access to critical data such as vital signs during surgical procedures by using Google Glass. This soultion is been pioneered by Philips Healthcare and Accenture who are collaborating to develop a new way to help surgeons deliver more efficient and effective patient care using Google Glass technology during surgical procedures.

References:

  1. Maria, D 2013,  How Google Glass Is Now Being Used During Surgery, 5 November 2013, Forbes, viewed 29 November 2013,<http://www.forbes.com/sites/ptc/2013/11/05/how-google-glass-is-now-being-used-during-surgery/>