Hospital screening criteria data to identify patients with nutritional or functional needs

Patient medical records should show evidence that information on nutritional status or functional status is gathered through the application of screening criteria, when patients who are acutely or chronically unwell and who are experiencing dietary difficulties and deficiencies related to or resulting from their illness, first contact hospital services.

From the post Assessments within 24 hours (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser), it is clear that the initial medical and nursing assessments are completed within 24 hours of admission to the hospital  or when the patient’s condition indicates, the initial medical and/or nursing assessment are conducted and available earlier, for use by all those caring for the patient. This means that patients are screened for nutritional risk as part of the initial assessment with the application of screening criteria to gather information on nutritional status or functional status which is often done by nurses, must also be completed routinely within 24 hours of admission to the hospital or at an earlier time period.

Nutritional screening is usually undertaken by nurses and doctors; assessment by dietitians.

GETTY_H_062112_WeightScale

Image credit: abcnewsradioonline.com

Nurses use individual hospital screening criteria to identify patients with nutritional or functional needs like:

  • unexpected weight loss
  • gastrointestinal symptoms
  • obvious emaciation
  • pressure ulcers
  • intravenous or tube feedings

In each case, the screening criteria are developed by qualified individuals with the aim to identify those who are malnourished or ‘at risk’ of becoming so and so able to further assess and, if necessary, to provide any required patient treatment. For example, screening criteria for nutritional risk may be developed by nurses who will apply the criteria, dietitians who will supply the recommended dietary intervention, and nutritionists able to integrate nutritional needs with the other needs of the patient.

Referencing of all tools available and screening criteria used  is beyond the scope of this single post. However, I like to share with you the desirable qualities of such tools used to carry out the screening which are namely (i) accuracy of the tool(sensitivity and specificity), (ii) easy to use, (iii) reliable so as to produce similar results with repeat testing in the same circumstances and with different users where the patient’s state has not changed it must be acceptable to those being screened, (iv) does not require extensive training, and (v) does not need additional equipment.

For your information too, two commonly used tools developed for hospital-wide application and used with older adults are (i) Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and (ii) Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST).

Information through these kinds of screening criteria tools provides insight into the patient’s overall physical health. The information may also indicate that patients at risk for nutritional problems according to the criteria, receive further or more in-depth assessment of nutritional status or functional status, including a fall-risk assessment.   This information is viewed as the most effective way and an essential first step in the management of patients’ nutritional care.

The more in-depth assessment mentioned above may be necessary to identify the problem or potential nutrition risk(s) for those high risk patients in need of nutritional interventions and patients in need of rehabilitation services or other services related to their ability to function independently or at their greatest potential. Nurses refer these patients in need of a functional assessment according to the criteria to the hospital Dietitian for full nutrition assessment.. The dietitian will usually first review the medical record of referred patients. Everything from diagnosis, social history, medical history, medication, laboratory data and assessment, and evaluations performed by other medical/clinical personnel are scrutinised  According to Jacqueline (2011), reading the medical record which contains the notes of other clinicians provides necessary context for effective management of the condition(s) being assessed. A dietitian may then take anthropometric measurements in addition to a subjective nutritional assessment.

Subjective data pertaining to the nutritional assessment, identify abnormal findings and client strengths which could include for example, Patient A who is a female, stated age 42 years; reports she had a fever for 2 days a week ago; drinks 4 to 6 glasses of water daily) and anthropometric measurements i.e the objective data could include for example, Height: 5 feet, 5 inches (165 cm); body frame: medium; weight: 128 lb (58 kg); BMI: 21.3). The data is usually clustered to reveal any significant patterns or abnormalities. These data may then be used to make clinical judgments about the status of the patient’s nutritional health.

At this point, I like you to take note that the dietitian uses assessments techniques which vary for the mother and unborn child as well as the complications associated with pregnancy, the lactating mother, infants and children.

Once the dietitian has a a clear understanding of the medical diagnosis and its nutritional implications, intervention is initiated, the patient is carefully monitored to ensure that goals are met and the desired outcome is achieved.

Do take note that if you are working at a hospital which is already Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation status, your hospital will need to comply with JCI Standard AOP.1.6 which states that “Patients are screened for nutritional status and functional needs and are referred for further assessment and treatment when necessary.”

I am sure you are already aware that your hospital has in place a program which evaluates its patients’ risk for falls – which could include fall history, medications-and-alcohol-consumption review, gait and balance screening, and walking aids used by the patient, and monitors both the intended and unintended consequences – for example, the inappropriate use of physical restraints or fluid intake restriction which may result in injury, impaired circulation, or compromised skin integrity of measures, taken to reduce falls.

JCI believes that compliance to JCI Standard AOP.1.6 as part of the initial assessment using criteria developed by qualified individuals to identify patients who require further functional assessment, further strengthens a hospital’s fall-risk reduction program.

It is common in hospitals when patients are provided dietetic services after dietary orders by the doctor attending are documented in the patient medical record. Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners will find within medical records, progress notes with the nutritional care of the patient met in accordance with the doctor’s orders and also the Dietary Progress Note, a progress note documented by the hospital dietitian as part of recognised dietary practices which includes:

  • patient’s dietary needs
  • any dietary observations made by staff (e.g., amount of meal consumed,food likes/dislikes, and so on)

HIM / MR practitioners who are members of a closed Medical Record Review, need to be aware that the Medical Record Review Tool will assess and determine the degree of compliance with standards and elements of performance relating to nutrition care given by the JCI Standard AOP.1.6, when there is evidence in the medical record of patients screened for nutritional status and functional needs.

References:

  1. Jacqueline, CM, 2011, Detitian’s guide to assessment and documentation, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA
  2. Janet, W, & Jane HK, 2010, Health assessment in nursing, 4th edn, Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  3. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA
  4. Nutritional screening and assessment, Nursing Times.net, viewed 17 February 2013, < http://www.nursingtimes.net/nutritional-screening-and-assessment/199381.article >
  5. Using nutritional screening tools to identify malnourished patients, Nursing Times.net, viewed 17 February 2013, < http://www.nursingtimes.net/nursing-practice/clinical-zones/nutrition/using-nutritional-screening-tools-to-identify-malnourished-patients/1958881.article >
  6. Michelle, AG & Mary, JB 2011, Essentials of Health Information Management: Principles and Practices, 2nd edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA
  7. Sue, CD & Patricia, KL 2011, Fundamentals of Nursing: Standards & Practice, 4th edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA

Remaining 3 posts on medical record documentation

I have based my previous posts on medical record documentation on the Joint Commission International (JCI) Standards found in the Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th Edition and The Joint Commission International Accreditation Hospital Survey Process Guide, 3rd Edition.

To round-up writing about all matters related to medical record documentation based on JCI’s Standards, I have recently discovered in the course of my study of the above mentioned manual/guide, that I need to write about three assessment activities to include under medical record documentation, before I can categorically state I have completed all of the required contents of a medical record to fully satisfy all JCI’s Standards related to medical record documentation and the process of a closed Medical Records Review.

To this effect, the remaining 3 posts on medical record documentation will cover :

  1. the information gathered at the initial medical and/or nursing assessment when patients are screened for nutritional status and functional needs and are referred for further assessment and treatment when necessary, including a fall-risk assessment;
  2. the need for discharge planning at the initial assessment for those patients for whom discharge planning is critical due to age, lack of mobility, continuing medical and nursing needs, or assistance with activities of daily living, among others; and
  3. reassessment conducted by a doctor in the ongoing patient care and when results are noted in the patient’s medical record for the information and use of all those caring for the patient.

For Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners working at a hospital which is already JCI accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation statusyou will need to take note that all of the 3 assessment activities listed above are included in the closed Medical Records Review.Tool. 

References:
Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Joint Commission International 2010, The Joint Commission International Accreditation Hospital Survey Process Guide, 3rd edn, JCI, USA

Laws of Malaysia (LOM) which may affect healthcare in Malaysia

Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners in Malaysia need to be aware of government statutes – especially those which may directly or indirectly affect healthcare in general and HIM / MR management in particular in Malaysia, while they go about discharging the duties.

I have a list below of Malaysian laws which I think may directly or indirectly affect healthcare in Malaysia. This is just a list in alphabetical order, and I suggest Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners explore any of them to increase their legal awareness to help them understand their legal rights, remedies, responsibilities & obligations.

I am no law expert, and this condensed list (each table of this list will open in a new tab of your current window for a larger view of each table) will not be here on this post if not for the complete list of the Laws of Malaysia (LOM) series available online from Mylawyer.com.my (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window), Malaysia’s free online legal resource, providing free legal information, articles, and government statutes. To quote Mylawyer.com.my :

“the following …… alphabetical list of laws in the Laws of Malaysia (LOM) series up to Act 655. The LOM series is a compilation and reprint of laws published in volume form pursuant to Section 14A of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]. It is the only official and authoritative publication of the laws of Malaysia. The LOM series incorporates all principal laws of Malaysia enacted after 1969 and pre-1969 laws which have been revised by the Commissioner of Law Revision. There are 40 volumes in the LOM series comprising the Federal Constitution in volume 1 and Acts 1 to 655 from volumes 2 to 40. The LOM series incorporates all amendments up to 1 January 2006 except otherwise indicated in the relevant law.”

Slide1 Slide2

Suggestions are welcome to improve this list.

I have also quoted some of these laws from the list above in previous post of the blog.

References:
MyLawyer.com.my, 2013, viewed 9 February 2013,< http://www.mylawyer.com.my/index.php >

MSQH – Introductory Post

MSQH-SS-7MSQH short for the Malaysian Society for Quality in Health, is the sole Malaysian accreditation body with nationally established standards for health care facilities and services since 1997, dedicated to improving the quality of Malaysia’s health care through voluntary accreditation.

MSQH’s standards cover all aspects of healthcare, beginning with the patient’s point of entry into the healthcare system, patient’s interphase with healthcare providers, staff ethics, training and their competencies and outcomes of care.

MSQH avails that its standards are at par with other hospital accreditation standards like the Joint Commission International (JCI) Standards after the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) had granted MSQH the highly esteemed honor that “accredits the accreditors” and provides worldwide recognition for accredited organisations like MSQH that meet approved international standards under ISQua’s International Accreditation Program (IAP).  This highly esteemed honor for the period from August 2008 to July 2012 reinforces that MSQH’s standards meet the highest international benchmark.

Effective January 2013, all MSQH accredited hospitals are surveyed once every four years, submit the 18 month and 30 month compliance reports, and will also undergo ‘Surprise Surveillance’ for continuous compliance based on the 4th Edition of the MSQH Hospital Accreditation Standards.

In this introductory post and in subsequent posts, I shall begin blogging about the MSQH SERVICE STANDARD 7 Health Information Management System based on the 4th Edition of the MSQH Hospital Accreditation Standards.

This standard is divided into 6 topics as follows:

TOPIC 7.1: ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT

TOPIC 7.2: HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT

TOPIC 7.3: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

TOPIC 7.4: FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

TOPIC 7.5: SAFETY AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES

TOPIC 7.6: SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Topic 1 to Topic 5 each have one standard, while Topic 6 has 2 standards. All the standards have a list of criteria for compliance.

I shall be writing about Topic 7.1 in my next post on MSQH SERVICE STANDARD 7.

References:
Malaysian Society for Quality in Health 2013, About, viewed 2 February 2013, <http://www.msqh.com.my/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=54>

Malaysian Society for Quality in Health 2013, CEO’s Message, viewed 2 February 2013, <http://www.msqh.com.my/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=61>

APDC: ICD-10 codes for 12 known and common diseases of the duodenum, gall bladder, liver, and pancreas

ICD-10-book-cover-for-APDC-series-labelBeginning with this post, I shall commence a series called “APDC”, short for “Anatomy and Physiology Disease Coding”.

Posts will feature anatomy vectors incorporating display of diseases and conditions terms from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10).

My aim of these posts is to share ICD-10 coding experiences on common diseases and conditions with readers  who have just embarked on a new career in Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) management and as a refresher for ICD-10-experienced readers.

By common, I am only highlighting the diseases and conditions that I have frequently encountered  principal diagnoses found in medical records here in Malaysia, and perhaps in your region too.

Today let us look at diseases and conditions common to the duodenum, gall bladder, liver, and pancreas. The image below shows some of the common diseases and conditions found in medical records for the duodenum, gall bladder, liver, and pancreas (click on the image to view a larger image in a new tab of your current browser window).

ICD10-codes-for-12-known-common-diseases-of-DGBLP

ICD-10 Chapter XI is the chapter that contains the ICD-10 codes for diseases of the digestive system, including those affecting the duodenum, gall bladder, liver, and pancreas.

Alcoholic liver disease usually occurs after years of drinking too much. The longer the alcohol use has occurred, and the more alcohol that was consumed, the greater the likelihood of developing liver disease, causing swelling and inflammation (hepatitis) in the liver. Over time, this can lead to scarring and then cirrhosis of the liver. Cirrhosis is the final phase of alcoholic liver disease. Code K70.3 for alcoholic liver disease is advised..

Acute cholecystitis is a sudden inflammation of the gallbladder that causes severe abdominal pain. In 90% of cases, acute cholecystitis is caused by gallstones in the gallbladder. Other causes include severe illness and (rarely) tumors of the gallbladder. If it is recorded as acute cholecystitis, then use the ICD-10 code, K81.0, but many times it is just recorded as cholecystitis, thus just use K81.

The cystic duct is the short duct that joins the gallbladder to the common bile duct. Gallstones can enter and obstruct the cystic duct, preventing the flow of bile. Have you encountered jaudice sometimes recorded in the medical record? The occurrence of jaundice due to inflammation of the gallbladder neck and adjacent hepatoduodenal ligament resulting from a stone lodged in the cystic duct could be defined as the Mirizzi syndrome, a rare complication. Inexperienced coders would just code the jaundice to R17, unspecified jaundice.

Duodenitis is inflammation of the duodenum, the first portion of the small intestine. The duodenum is a tube around a foot long. Its near end connects to the stomach; the duodenum’s far end blends into the rest of the small intestine.

Duodenitis can only be diagnosed with a tissue biopsy, which is performed using endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy). Hence, Biopsy or endoscopy are common ways of recording diagnosis, which means the Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioner must read the contents of the medical record to derive at a more decisive ICD-10 code.  Some of you must have known the diagnosis Crohn’s disease –  an inflammatory condition that can cause duodenitis,:recorded as the principal diagnosis in medical records. If you are certain that duodenitis is the reason for the endoscopy, then use ICD-10 code K29.8, otherwise just code Crohn’s disease.

The shape of the pancreas is like a tadpole, the pancreas can be affected in its head (the rightmost portion that lies adjacent to the duodenum), body (the middle portion of the pancreas), tail (the leftmost portion of the pancreas that lies adjacent to the spleen) parts, and the ducts that lead away from the pancreas.

Most people have just one pancreatic duct. The pancreatic duct (functional), or duct of Wirsung (also referred as the Major pancreatic duct), is a duct joining the pancreas to the common bile duct to supply pancreatic juices which aid in digestion. The pancreatic duct joins the common bile duct just prior to the ampulla of Vater, after which both ducts perforate the medial side of the second portion of the duodenum. However, some people have an additional accessory pancreatic duct also called the Duct of Santorini (non-functional), which connects straight to the duodenum, bypassing the Ampulla of Vater.

Compression, obstruction or inflammation of the pancreatic duct may lead to acute pancreatitis. The most common cause for this obstruction is choledocholithiasis, or gallstones in the common hepatic duct. ICD-10 Code K80.5 is the correct code for choledocholithiasis. Obstruction can also be due to duodenal inflammation in Crohn’s Disease. A gallstone may get lodged in the constricted distal end of the ampulla of Vater, where it blocks the flow of both bile and pancreatic juice into the duodenum. Bile backing up into the pancreatic duct may initiate pancreatitis. Calculus of pancreas is the condition when a gallstone may get lodged in the pancreatic duct. ICD-10 Code K86.8 is used for this condition.

Sometimes doctors will record the discharge diagnosis as ERCP, short for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, which is a technique that combines the use of endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and treat certain problems of the biliary or pancreatic ductal systems. Through the endoscope, the surgeon can see the inside of the stomach and duodenum, and inject dyes into the ducts in the biliary tree and pancreas so they can be seen on X-rays. ERCP is used primarily to diagnose and treat conditions of the bile ducts and main pancreatic duct, including gallstones. Since procedure coding is yet to be implemented in most hospitals in Malaysia,  I like to suggest that Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners must read the medical record to determine the right ICD-10 to use. Is the patient suffering from acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis, or a disease of biliary tract, unspecified and the ERCP done for diagnostic purposes. I think in this instance it is best to code this case as K83.9 for disease of biliary tract, unspecified.

Fibrosis of pancreas (K86.8) is a specified disease of the pancreas.caused by such processes as necrosis (a form of cell injury that results in the premature death of cells in living tissue), inflammation or duct obstruction, in this instance the accessory pancreatic duct due to chronic pancreatitis.

Malignant neoplasm (cancer) may affect the head of pancreas, acute pancreatitis may be caused by the middle pancreas, and malignant neoplasm (cancer) may also affect the tail of pancreas. ICD-10 C25.0 is used to code malignant neoplasm of the head of pancreas, ICD-10 C25.2 is used to code malignant neoplasm of the tail of pancreas, and ICD-10 K85 is used to code acute pancreatitis causes by the middle pancreas. Do remember to refer to Chapter IV (appropriate codes in this chapter, i.e. E05.8, E07.0, E16-E31, E34.-) that may be used, if desired, as additional codes to indicate either functional activity by neoplasms and ectopic endocrine tissue or hyperfunction and hypofunction of endocrine glands associated with neoplasms and other conditions classified elsewhere. For those wishing to identify the histological type of neoplasm, then provide the separate morphology codes from the section Morphology of neoplasms..

Cholangitis is an infection of the common bile duct, the tube that carries bile from the liver to the gallbladder and intestines. Bile is a liquid made by the liver that helps digest food. Cholangitis is usually caused by a bacterial infection, which can occur when the duct is blocked by something, such as a gallstone or tumor. The infection causing this condition may also spread to the liver. Use ICD-10 Code K83.0 for Cholangitis affecting the bile duct. You may need to code the infection as well.

Bile duct obstruction is a blockage in the tubes that carry bile from the liver to the gallbladder and small intestine. Either or both of the left and right hepatic ducts can be affected. If the obstruction is not due to calculus, then the ICD-10 code K83.1 must be used. The presence of gall stones in these ducts requires the use of the ICD-10 codes K80.3, K80.4 and K80.5

Do exercise caution when applying these codes (K80.3, K80.4 and K80.5) when cholelithiasis, or gallstones, a common syndrome in which hard stones composed of cholesterol or bile pigments form in the gallbladder is also reported.

References:

  1. Nicki, RC, Brian, RW & Stuart, HR 2010, Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine, 21 edn, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Elsevier Health Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
  2. William, DC 2010, Current clinical medicine, 2nd edn, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  3. World Health Organization 2011, Volume 1 Tabular list, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, 2010 edn, Geneva, Switzerland